1985
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7916(85)90004-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of the reliability of time sampling versus continuous observation data collection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EE m was obtained by measuring the amount of VO z and VCO z (32). The VO z and VCO z of each subject were calculated by measuring the changes in oxygen and carbon dioxide contents in the air inside the room calorimeter, and by multiplying the flow rate of the purged air by its concentration of oxygen and carbon dioxide, respectively.…”
Section: Measured Ee Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EE m was obtained by measuring the amount of VO z and VCO z (32). The VO z and VCO z of each subject were calculated by measuring the changes in oxygen and carbon dioxide contents in the air inside the room calorimeter, and by multiplying the flow rate of the purged air by its concentration of oxygen and carbon dioxide, respectively.…”
Section: Measured Ee Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lingering concern is that observations of physical activity have not been compared to measurements ofchildren's energy expenditure (Bullen, Reed, & Mayer, 1964;Corbin & Fletcher, 1968;Hovell, Bursick, Sharkey, & McClure, 1978;Klesges et al, 1983;Klesges & Klesges, 1987;Klesges, Wolfrey, & Vollmer, 1985;Kucera, 1985Kucera, , 1986O'Hara, Baranowski, Simons-Morton, Wilson, & Parcel, 1989;Wallace, McKenzie, & Nader, 1985). O'Hara et al (1989), for example, used a simple ordinal point system for intensity estimation and literature-based estimates ofchildren's energy expenditure values (METS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time for data input and interobserver agreement were contrasted, and overall results showed that the VRT method was more time efficient and led to significantly more accurate interobserver agreement. Saudargas and Zanolli (1990) and Klesges, Woolfrey, and Vollmer (1985) contrasted traditional and computer-assisted methods to assess the accuracy of momentary time sampling against real-time data collection but did not focus on the advantages and disadvantages of the methods themselves along a broader set of dimensions relevant to the decisions a researcher would need to make in choosing between traditional and computer-assisted methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%