2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of the proton structure functions F2 and F at small x

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collaborations at HERA contributed high-precision data for measuring the proton structure function F p 2 at different kinematical regions of x and Q 2 [27,28]. Some recent works on the measurement of proton structure functions using various evolution equations and approaches are described in [29][30][31][32][33], and the results correlate well with the experimental data. In [34], for the first time, the reproduction of measurements of the DIS proton structure function at high energy from the color dipole description in momentum space was investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The collaborations at HERA contributed high-precision data for measuring the proton structure function F p 2 at different kinematical regions of x and Q 2 [27,28]. Some recent works on the measurement of proton structure functions using various evolution equations and approaches are described in [29][30][31][32][33], and the results correlate well with the experimental data. In [34], for the first time, the reproduction of measurements of the DIS proton structure function at high energy from the color dipole description in momentum space was investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…where r , s is defined due to the splitting and Wilson coefficient functions. The convolution form A(x)⊙B(x) reads to be [36] A(x)⊙B(x)≡ dz z A(a s , z)B(z).…”
Section: Heavy Quarks Structure Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 does not exhibit purely Q 2 -independent behavior, with the structure function's Q 2 -dependence increasing at small-x. Thus, to align the results with theoretical expectations [31,[61][62][63], experimental data [26,27,[64][65][66] and global parametrizations [25,67,68], it is crucial to address the condition of both x and Q 2 dependencies of the function K in the study. Nevertheless, obtaining analytical solutions based on these assumptions necessitates additional ultra small-x approximations, even considering the adjustments introduced by the method reported in reference [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%