An Evaluation of the Influence of Natural Science in Regional-Scale Restoration Projects

Abstract

Regional-scale restoration is a tool of growing importance in environmental management, and the number, scope, and complexity of restoration programs is increasing. Although the importance of natural science to the success of such projects generally is recognized, the actual use of natural science in these programs rarely has been evaluated. We used techniques of program evaluation to examine the use of natural science in six American and three Western European regional-scale restoration programs. Our results suggest that ensuring the technical rigor and directed application of the science is important to program development and delivery. However, the influence of science may be constrained if strategies for its integration into the broader program are lacking. Consequently, the influence of natural science in restoration programs is greatest when formal mechanisms exist for incorporating science into programs, for example, via a framework for integration of science and policy. Our evaluation proposes a model that can be used to enhance the influence of natural science in regional-scale restoration programs in the United States and elsewhere.

Rethinking marine infrastructure policy and practice: Insights from three large-scale marina developments in Seattle

“…The legacy of shoreline change throughout the Pacific Northwest catalyzed a rich body of research on large-scale coastal restoration with relevance to coastal cities globally [113][114][115][116][117]. Current evolutions in ecological science and guidance continue to have relevance to marinas and other marine related built environments, in particular: (a) comparative studies of biodiversity and community assemblage on built versus natural substrates [118][119][120], (b) roles of invasive species on built structures [121], and (c) emerging studies on ecological influences of marine energy installations [122,8].…”

Removal of Physical Materials from Systems

“…Van Cleve et al (2006) reviewed several large regional-scale restoration projects to evaluate the influence of natural science in coastal restoration ( Figure 4). They analyzed how restora tion efforts integrate science into the organizational structure and assess if adequate organization would dictate the effective use of science.…”

“…Using techniques of program evaluation to analyze the use of natural science, Van Cleve et al (2006) found that the use of science can be con strained by the absence of formal, integrated mechanisms for including science into program execution. One of their major findings is the different perception of the word 'restoration' in Europe where returning a system to a 'pristine' condition is considered neither possible nor desirable.…”

Coral Reef Restoration and Artificial Reef Management, Future and Economic

“…state will be a best guess, subjective or valued judgement [17]. Fonseca et al (2002) [18] make the further distinction between compensatory restoration and primary restoration.…”