2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of the impact of the Gold Standards Framework on collaboration in end-of-life care in nursing homes. A qualitative and quantitative evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…32,33 Effective collaboration between these two groups can be mutually beneficial as it allows the team to achieve goals not otherwise possible by providing opportunities for accessing resources and services that are integrated for the specific benefit of the patient. 10,11,19,34,35 …”
Section: Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Holismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 Effective collaboration between these two groups can be mutually beneficial as it allows the team to achieve goals not otherwise possible by providing opportunities for accessing resources and services that are integrated for the specific benefit of the patient. 10,11,19,34,35 …”
Section: Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Holismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on models such as the Gold Standards Framework in Care Homes (GFSCH)36 in the UK, and the residential aged care integration programme (RACIP)37 study (involving gerontology ARC outreach) in New Zealand, as well as results from the present study, the new model includes clinical coaching, and role modelling of both elements are shown to be successful in sustaining knowledge transfer 38. Staff in the current study indicated difficulty identifying when a palliative approach should be initiated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI did not preclude the use and refinement of existing Advance Care Plans, end-of-life care frameworks and extra training in end-of-life care, all of which aim to address the same issues. [238][239][240] AI led to their increased use (DNACPR, palliative care register, LCP 215 ). However, its context-specific, non-hierarchical approach to co-design was arguably more flexible and better suited to working across organisations and between public and independent providers.…”
Section: Summary and Discussion Of Phase 2 Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%