2014
DOI: 10.1108/el-01-2013-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of the functionality and accessibility of e-readers for individuals with print disabilities

Abstract: Purpose – This study aims to examine the usability of three popular electronic reading devices (e-readers) to determine which device provides the best functionality for individuals with print disabilities. Adaptability and flexibility for use with assistive technology are also evaluated. Design/methodology/approach – This study reports the results of a usability test of e-readers and their potential for use by individuals with print disa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a decrease in reported concern in regard to equipment that lagged behind the ICT market. The researchers postulate this may be due to a combination of events over the past six years, including the increase of the accessibility features of mainstream technologies such as websites (Maatta Smith, 2014) and e-readers (Maatta and Bonnici, 2013) as well as the deployment of the new media players distributed by the NLS. However, some challenges were expressed in regard to decreases in budget impacting technology availability.…”
Section: Nls/bph Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a decrease in reported concern in regard to equipment that lagged behind the ICT market. The researchers postulate this may be due to a combination of events over the past six years, including the increase of the accessibility features of mainstream technologies such as websites (Maatta Smith, 2014) and e-readers (Maatta and Bonnici, 2013) as well as the deployment of the new media players distributed by the NLS. However, some challenges were expressed in regard to decreases in budget impacting technology availability.…”
Section: Nls/bph Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many DETB are inaccessible due to the fact that most authors are oblivious about the accessibility guidelines for the visually impaired individuals (Lin, Chiou and Huang, 2013). They are not strictly abide by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 accessibility guidelines to make the DETB accessible before publishing them online and distributing them into the market (Maatta & Bonnici, 2014). There are rather limited adaptive technology or other forms of accessible devices that are not entirely compatible with the DETB content.…”
Section: Restrictions To Effective Use Of Adaptive Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there remains a heavy focus on library websites in the accessibility literature, other types of online resources have come into question as well, including research databases (Blechner, 2015); online exhibits and collections of digitized and born-digital materials (Walker and Keenan, 2015; Xie et al , 2015; Sorrell et al , 2017; Babu and Xie, 2017); instructional objects (Oud, 2011; Wakimoto and Soules, 2011; Wray, 2013; Clossen, 2014; Clossen and Proces, 2017); archival finding aids (Southwell and Slater, 2012, 2013); e-books and e-readers (Maatta and Bonnici, 2014; Mune and Agee, 2016; Dobson and McNaught, 2017; Kahler, 2017; McNaught et al , 2018); digital talking books (Lundh and Johnson, 2015); live instruction sessions (Pionke, 2017a); and the widely-used Springshare platform LibGuides (Pionke and Manson, 2018). While many of these studies are good starting points and will serve as useful references for library practitioners concerned with approaching specific technologies from an accessibility perspective, it is impossible in some cases not to notice a persistent lack of direct engagement with users with diverse abilities.…”
Section: Evaluating Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%