2016
DOI: 10.1353/etc.2016.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the Evidence Base for Performance Feedback to Improve Teacher Praise Using CEC’s Quality Indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2013; Floress et al, 2017;Sweigart et al, 2016) by including a larger search time frame, including studies in pre-K settings and focusing on coaching to increase teachers' use of BSP. The 45 included articles contained 48 studies, 16 (33.33%) of which met 100% of the QIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2013; Floress et al, 2017;Sweigart et al, 2016) by including a larger search time frame, including studies in pre-K settings and focusing on coaching to increase teachers' use of BSP. The 45 included articles contained 48 studies, 16 (33.33%) of which met 100% of the QIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Cavanaugh's review differs from the present review in that (a) the definition of feedback used by Cavanaugh was narrower in scope, and (b) Cavanaugh did not apply standards for methodological rigor to individual studies in assessing the evidence base. Sweigart, Collins, Evanovich, and Cook (2016) applied CEC standards to articles meeting inclusion criteria of using performance feedback to increase teacher use of BSP. They defined performance feedback as nonevaluative information based on data collected via observation that seeks to reinforce desired teacher behaviors and correct undesired behaviors.…”
Section: Behavior-specific Praisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A coding sheet developed by the first author and used in previous evidence-based reviews (e.g., S. C. Cook, Cook, & Cook, 2017; Sweigart, Collins, Evanovich, & Cook, 2016) was used to rate each QI. All studies were double coded by the first and second author (both of whom have experience in conducting evidence-based reviews) with an overall, interrater agreement of 97.3% (range: 90.9%–100%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review builds on previous reviews of BIE because it includes gray literature and RPF provided with other technology (e.g., visual PF using an iPad). Following a framework presented in a review of PF to improve teacher praise (Sweigart, Collins, Evanovich, & Cook, 2016), we used the Council for Exceptional Children’s (CEC, 2014) Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education to evaluate the quality of research base on teacher-level interventions to answer two research questions:…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%