2005
DOI: 10.1159/000085150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the ‘Coping with Depression Course’ for Relapse Prevention with Unipolar Depressed Patients

Abstract: Background: Patients with treated episodes of depression are at high risk of relapse and recurrence. This study describes the clinical course of patients who had received cognitive-behavioral group intervention for relapse prevention. Method: Forty-four remitted unipolar depressed patients with recently treated episodes of illness participated in a 16-week group program, the ‘Coping with Depression Course’ (CWD). The majority of patients had suffered from multiple episodes of depression and nearly half of them… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most striking nondifferential predictors of earlier time to recurrence were more residual depressive symptomatology and higher levels of dysfunctional attitudes. In previous studies cognitive behavior treatment was found to be effective in decreasing residual symptoms of depression and dysfunctional attitudes, although true mediation of treatment effect by these changes has not been tested [6, 32]. Unexpectedly in this study these presumed risk factors [30, 33] did not differentially predict recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The most striking nondifferential predictors of earlier time to recurrence were more residual depressive symptomatology and higher levels of dysfunctional attitudes. In previous studies cognitive behavior treatment was found to be effective in decreasing residual symptoms of depression and dysfunctional attitudes, although true mediation of treatment effect by these changes has not been tested [6, 32]. Unexpectedly in this study these presumed risk factors [30, 33] did not differentially predict recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…We excluded seven other studies because they either did not report relapse rates (Barhofer et al . 2007; Kingston et al 2007), were not randomized controlled trials (Klerman et al 1974; Kühner et al 1996; Blackburn & Moore, 1997; Kühner, 2005) or focused on telephone-based psychotherapy as opposed to face-to-face sessions (Miller & Weissman, 2002). We also excluded three studies of the sequential use of psychotherapy either because they involved patients who had successfully responded to antidepressant drugs, and then relapsed (Fava et al 2002; Fabbri et al 2007), or because they involved patients who had not remitted with acute-phase psychotherapy (Frank et al 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recently updated NICE guidelines on depression (National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health 2009a) state that there is a place within the stepped care model of treatment for group CBT based on the 'Coping with Depression' approach (Lewinsohn 1989;Kuehner 2005). This approach, which uses the concepts of traditional CBT, has a strong psychoeducational element and consists of twelve 2-hour sessions over 8 weeks (sessions are twice weekly for the first 4 weeks).…”
Section: Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%