2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-020-09398-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Strategic Incremental Rehearsal on Sight Word Acquisition Among Students with Specific Learning Disabilities in Reading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IR has been observed to be more effective and efficient for learning and retention of factual-level content than other flashcard techniques for students of different ages and ability levels (e.g., Burns, 2005; Burns et al, 2019; MacQuarrie et al, 2002). For example, IR has been used in research to improve performance with letter sounds (e.g., Volpe et al, 2011), sight words (e.g., Phipps et al, 2020), vocabulary (e.g., Petersen-Brown & Burns, 2011); and math facts (e.g., McVancel et al, 2018). In describing the cognitive underpinnings of IR, Varma and Schleisman (2014) argue that the superiority of IR over other flashcard techniques is likely due to the spaced and expanded structure of practice.…”
Section: Strategies For Building Fluency In Mathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IR has been observed to be more effective and efficient for learning and retention of factual-level content than other flashcard techniques for students of different ages and ability levels (e.g., Burns, 2005; Burns et al, 2019; MacQuarrie et al, 2002). For example, IR has been used in research to improve performance with letter sounds (e.g., Volpe et al, 2011), sight words (e.g., Phipps et al, 2020), vocabulary (e.g., Petersen-Brown & Burns, 2011); and math facts (e.g., McVancel et al, 2018). In describing the cognitive underpinnings of IR, Varma and Schleisman (2014) argue that the superiority of IR over other flashcard techniques is likely due to the spaced and expanded structure of practice.…”
Section: Strategies For Building Fluency In Mathmentioning
confidence: 99%