2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of some pertinent parameters that influence the dosimetric performance of synthetic diamond detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presented in Table 1 are values of the [N s ] for the diamond crystals as determined by ESR. The reason for the much higher levels of N s impurities of the HPHT and OG crystals compared to the DG samples has been explained in our previous study (Ade et al, 2013).…”
Section: Esr and Ftir Absorption Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Presented in Table 1 are values of the [N s ] for the diamond crystals as determined by ESR. The reason for the much higher levels of N s impurities of the HPHT and OG crystals compared to the DG samples has been explained in our previous study (Ade et al, 2013).…”
Section: Esr and Ftir Absorption Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 62%
“…(3)) which expresses the contribution of the leakage current to the measured detector current I, might therefore influence the dose rate dependence of a given detector depending on its magnitude and fluctuation. In this study the leakage current of each diamond detector which was observed to be greatly influenced by ambient light was investigated in a similar procedure as reported in a previous study (Ade et al, 2012). The HPHT sample was found to have the lowest dark current value which did not vary between irradiations compared to its CVD counterparts and it was observed that the dark current increases with applied voltage.…”
Section: Dependence Of δ On Beam Energy and Typementioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations