2006
DOI: 10.1660/0022-8443(2006)109[131:aeosvm]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of single-pass versus multiple-pass backpack electrofishing to estimate trends in species abundance and richness in prairie streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of straight and bag seines (4.7-mm mesh) and DC-pulsed backpack or tote-barge electrofishing were used to capture fish and effort was standardized (i.e., one pass for each gear type) across all sites. Bertrand et al (2006) compared estimates of relative abundance of minnows in prairie streams based on one-and three-pass electrofishing and showed that one-pass estimates of relative abundance were highly concordant with threepass estimates.…”
Section: Environmental Niche Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of straight and bag seines (4.7-mm mesh) and DC-pulsed backpack or tote-barge electrofishing were used to capture fish and effort was standardized (i.e., one pass for each gear type) across all sites. Bertrand et al (2006) compared estimates of relative abundance of minnows in prairie streams based on one-and three-pass electrofishing and showed that one-pass estimates of relative abundance were highly concordant with threepass estimates.…”
Section: Environmental Niche Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling was conducted through a single-pass at each location without block-nets along a minimum of 100 m stretches whenever possible, covering all habitats available at this scale following the recommendations of the FAME Consortium (2004) for European rivers. This sampling method was selected to adequately characterize spatial trends in abundance and species richness (Bertrand et al 2006, Sa´ly et al 2009). All fish were identified to species and returned to the water.…”
Section: Fish and Habitat Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much less is known about the relative efficacy of double or multiple-pass removals compared with the reach length optimization based single-pass method. In fact, most studies suggest that single-pass surveys of longer stream reaches are more effective than multiple-pass depletion of shorter sections for assessing reach level assemblage attributes (Paller, 1995;Reynolds et al, 2003;Bertrand et al, 2006;Reid et al, 2009), while others argue for the opposite sampling strategy (Kennard et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the purpose is to analyse spatial and temporal patterns in assemblage level attributes double-pass electrofishing may mean a compromise, because the most important variables (i.e. species richness, composition and relative abundance) usually do not change significantly after the second or in most cases even the first pass (Bertrand et al, 2006;Humpl and Lusk, 2006;Reid et al, 2009). However, the relative efficiency of single-pass electrofishing of longer sections vs. the double-pass surveys of shorter reaches in estimating assemblage level variables is largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%