2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of sampling- and culturing methods in the Norwegian action plan against Campylobacter in broilers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The collection of faecal samples was based on the method described by Sandberg et al., 2006. In each sector, ten individual fresh faecal droppings, each consisting of approximately 5 g of faecal material, were collected and mixed in a sterile pot using a wooden spatula.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The collection of faecal samples was based on the method described by Sandberg et al., 2006. In each sector, ten individual fresh faecal droppings, each consisting of approximately 5 g of faecal material, were collected and mixed in a sterile pot using a wooden spatula.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sampling methods are in use to detect Campylobacter in broiler houses, including cloacal swabs (Hansson et al., 2004), faecal samples (Sandberg et al., 2006), caecal contents (Allen et al., 2007; Rosenquist et al., 2009) and boot swabs or the equivalent boot sock model (Bull et al., 2006; Ellis‐Iversen et al., 2011; Ridley et al., 2011). Boot swabs are a widely used sampling method for Salmonella testing in broilers, turkeys and laying hens on floor systems and for the statutory monitoring of chicken breeding flocks (Mueller‐Doblies et al., 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, while Revez et al (2008) evaluate caecal contents, Piccirillo et al (2011) examined rectal swabs. Several sampling methods are in use to detect Campylobacter in broiler houses, including cloacal swabs (Hansson et al, 2004), faecal samples (Sandberg et al, 2006), caecal contents (Allen et al, 2007;Rosenquist et al, 2009). However, there is not yet an accepted standard method for the detection and isolation of Campylobacter spp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the AFLP profiles, the 20-25 observed bands ranging from 50 to 450 bp in size, were included in the analysis. The discriminatory power of the method was verified by analysing 24 strains from eight different flocks isolated in a previous project (Sandberg et al 2005b), results not shown. The relatedness between the strains was analysed with bionumerics 3.0 software (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%