2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of robust controls for passive building thermal mass and mechanical thermal energy storage under uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is difficult to probabilistically define uncertainties in the future economy such as electricity prices and policy changes [22]. As such, one way to proceed is to use 'scenarios', which can be understood as formulated alternatives when probabilities of uncertainties are unknown [26,27] and can be used to integrate uncertainties into the performance robustness assessment [13,26]. Scenarios are used to present a range of possible alternatives so that the performance robustness of designs can be assessed based on how different designs perform in each of these alternatives [28].…”
Section: Performance Robustness Assessment Based On Scenario Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is difficult to probabilistically define uncertainties in the future economy such as electricity prices and policy changes [22]. As such, one way to proceed is to use 'scenarios', which can be understood as formulated alternatives when probabilities of uncertainties are unknown [26,27] and can be used to integrate uncertainties into the performance robustness assessment [13,26]. Scenarios are used to present a range of possible alternatives so that the performance robustness of designs can be assessed based on how different designs perform in each of these alternatives [28].…”
Section: Performance Robustness Assessment Based On Scenario Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than utilizing building thermal mass, the operation strategies for TES which are derived by mathematical programming, model predictive control (MPC) and reinforcement learning approaches are demonstrated to outperform the conventional control strategy such as chiller-priority and storage-priority strategies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The near-optimal TES control strategy proposed in [9] is comparable to optimal TES control strategy obtained by dynamic programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The near-optimal TES control strategy proposed in [9] is comparable to optimal TES control strategy obtained by dynamic programming. To significantly improve building energy performance and reduce energy cost, a robust MPC is proposed to obtain operation strategy for building thermal mass and TES [11]. A MPC algorithm is proposed in [14] to operate the chiller and TES systems which is able to achieve 5-20% cost savings compared to a modified storage-priority strategy and 20-30% cost savings compared to the chiller-priority strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty-based control amalgamated into MPC can be considered one of the viable approaches for maintaining the system's operational stability, even under uncertain conditions [48]. Generically, the uncertainty can be referred to as the gap present between the certainty and the present state of information (obtained from decision making) as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Figure 1312mentioning
confidence: 99%