2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00148-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of prospective COVID-19 modelling studies in the USA: from data to science translation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we focus on reported cases and primarily on the European Forecast Hub but our observations hold, in our view, across COVID-19 Forecast Hubs and to a lesser degree targets. We focus on reported cases as these represent the most common forecast target for COVID-19 forecast models (Nixon et al 2022), they are often of the most direct interest due to being a leading indicator for other metrics such as hospitalisations (Meakin et al 2022), and they are generally the most challenging to predict (Sherratt et al 2022). In general, 5 main classes of forecast models are submitted (Bracher et al 2022; Cramer et al 2022), statistical forecasting models such as ARIMA models, mechanistic forecasting models based on the compartmental modelling framework and its generalisations (Srivastava, Xu, and Prasanna 2020; Li et al 2021), semi-mechanistic approaches that blend both of these approaches (Castro et al 2021; Bosse et al 2022), agent-based simulation models (Rakowski et al 2010; Adamik et al 2020), and human insight based forecast models that may also include elements of other methods (Karlen 2020; Bosse et al 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we focus on reported cases and primarily on the European Forecast Hub but our observations hold, in our view, across COVID-19 Forecast Hubs and to a lesser degree targets. We focus on reported cases as these represent the most common forecast target for COVID-19 forecast models (Nixon et al 2022), they are often of the most direct interest due to being a leading indicator for other metrics such as hospitalisations (Meakin et al 2022), and they are generally the most challenging to predict (Sherratt et al 2022). In general, 5 main classes of forecast models are submitted (Bracher et al 2022; Cramer et al 2022), statistical forecasting models such as ARIMA models, mechanistic forecasting models based on the compartmental modelling framework and its generalisations (Srivastava, Xu, and Prasanna 2020; Li et al 2021), semi-mechanistic approaches that blend both of these approaches (Castro et al 2021; Bosse et al 2022), agent-based simulation models (Rakowski et al 2010; Adamik et al 2020), and human insight based forecast models that may also include elements of other methods (Karlen 2020; Bosse et al 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever the method, a recognized shortcoming in the existing COVID-19 modeling literature is the lack of rigorous and robust evaluation, which is critical to assess and compare model performance. 22 On October 19th 2021, the CDC COVID-19 Forecast Hub published the EPIFORGE guidelines to attempt to improve the quality of models, highlighting the importance of consistency, interpretability, reproducibility, and comparability of models. 23 However, most model evaluation presented in the published literature remains incomprehensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23 However, most model evaluation presented in the published literature remains incomprehensive. 22 Many models are evaluated for a single forecasting period, according to a single error metric, and sometimes not evaluated retrospectively at all. 22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been numerous theoretical models proposed for understanding spread of infection of COVID-19 14 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%