An evaluation of personal medical services: the times they are a changin'

Abstract

The Personal Medical Services (PMS) pilot sites, launched in England in 1997 by the Secretary of State for the then Conservative government, introduced a local contract for primary care, aimed at promoting flexibility, innovation and policy participation. As part of the National Evaluation of PMS, this paper considers the professional and organisational relationships established between service providers working in those PMS sites which specifically set out to address inequalities in access to primary care for vulnerable populations. The introduction of PMS enabled a change of cultural values in primary care, particularly regarding GPs' relationships with nurses and practice staff. However, PMS has not necessarily led to equal partnerships within primary care teams. Rather,in the selected sites evaluated new interprofessional relationships emerged. There was evidence of intra and interprofessional partnerships being forged, providing the basis for further improved intersectoral collaboration. There was also evidence that the GP based medical model made way for a community oriented/public health model with emphasis on health maintenance for the vulnerable.

Primary care team working in Ireland: a qualitative exploration of team members’ experiences in a new primary care service

“…Our findings did not report significant conflict within teams as has been reported in other studies (Riley et al . , Shaw et al . , Brown et al .…”

“…Certain factors can, however, hinder effective PCT working including the presence of hierarchical structures within teams, where some members view their roles as superior to others (Riley et al . ) and issues with role boundaries, role misunderstanding and changed roles. Hansson et al .…”

Treatment of minor illness in primary care: a national survey of patient satisfaction, attitudes and preferences regarding a wider nursing role

“…The role for PNs in the UK has been developing rapidly, with much innovation in delivery of care 29 . Other countries, e.g.…”

A scoping literature review of collaboration between primary care and public health

“…At the practice level, there were improvements in the understanding of PC and PH concepts, areas of responsibility and roles Headland et al, 2000;Leeds et al, 2000;Cook et al, 2001;Heller et al, 2003;Morgan and Kelly, 2004), team functioning (Gerrish, 1999;Leeds et al, 2000;Andrews, 2002;Riley et al, 2003) and information sharing Banks-Smith et al, 2001;Kaufman et al, 2006).…”