This article explores the role of age, cognitive abilities, prior experience, and knowledge in skill acquisition for a computer-based simulated customer service task. Fifty-two participants aged 50-80 performed the task over 4 consecutive days following training. They also completed a battery that assessed prior computer experience and cognitive abilities. The data indicated that overall quality and efficiency of performance improved with practice. The predictors of initial level of performance and rate of change in performance varied according to the performance parameter assessed. Age and fluid intelligence predicted initial level and rate of improvement in overall quality, whereas crystallized intelligence and age predicted initial e-mail processing time, and crystallized intelligence predicted rate of change in e-mail processing time over days. We discuss the implications of these findings for the design of intervention strategies.The existing literature of aging and cognition indicates that many component cognitive abilities -such as processing speed, working memory, and reasoning-associated with the fluid aspect of intelligence, which generally represents the processing and reasoning aspects of intelligence (Horn & Catell, 1966), show decline with age, especially under conditions of complexity or when a task represents an unfamiliar cognitive domain (e.g., Park, 1999). In contrast, knowledge or what is referred to as crystallized intelligence remains relatively stable or increases throughout the life span at least until about age 70 (Schaie, 1996). There are numerous examples of studies that indicate age differences on measures of component cognitive abilities that reflect the fluid aspects of intelligence and the performance of tasks that draw on these abilities (e.g., Fisk & Rogers, 1991). There are also numerous studies that report age-related differences in skill acquisition. These studies generally indicate that older adults learn new skills more slowly than younger adults and do not reach the same levels of performance (e.g., Charness & Campbell, 1988;Jenkins & Hoyer, 2000;Rogers, Fisk, & Hertzog, 1994;Salthouse, 1994).An important issue is the relevance of these findings to everyday tasks within real world settings. Within this context there is limited information on the influence of individual differences in component cognitive abilities or other factors, such as prior experience or knowledge, on skill acquisition or learning. Most of the research that scientists have conducted on skill acquisition has involved laboratory tasks in controlled environments. Examining factors that impact learning is especially important in today's world, given the ubiquitous use of technology in most settings.Address correspondence to Sara J. Czaja, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1695 NW 9th Ave., Miami, FL 33136. E-mail: sczaja@med. miami.edu.
NIH Public AccessAuthor Manuscript J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. Author manuscript; available...