2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of oil pollution prevention strategies in the Arctic: A comparison of Canadian and U.S. approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both Russia and Canada try hard to “internalize” NSR and NWP, the international community never pays it. The United States and European Union contested Canada’s internalization claim, considering NWP is “an international strait, open to use by all states” (Thorsell and Leschine 2016 ).…”
Section: Status Quo Of Prevention and Control Of Ship-source Pollutio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although both Russia and Canada try hard to “internalize” NSR and NWP, the international community never pays it. The United States and European Union contested Canada’s internalization claim, considering NWP is “an international strait, open to use by all states” (Thorsell and Leschine 2016 ).…”
Section: Status Quo Of Prevention and Control Of Ship-source Pollutio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canada Shipping Act (hereinafter “CSA”) (2001) prohibits the discharge of oil into Canadian Waters, including the internalized Arctic Water. Penalties for violation of it are up to a $1,000,000 fine or 18 months in prison (Thorsell and Leschine 2016 ).…”
Section: Status Quo Of Prevention and Control Of Ship-source Pollutio...mentioning
confidence: 99%