1965
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1965.00021962005700020015x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Nitrogen Fertilization in Legume‐Grass and All‐Grass Pasture1

Abstract: Synopsis A simple legume‐grass mixture was more productive than a grass + N mixture in 1958 but less productive in 1959, following legume depletion due to winter‐killing. A low rate of nitrogen applied to depleted legume‐grass swards was economically superior to high rates on either legume‐depleted or all‐grass pastures, but especially the latter. Results over the 5‐year period suggest the desirability of seeding simple legume‐grass mixtures with limited nitrogen amendments after legume depletion rather than s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the four mixtures, the three‐, six‐, and nine‐species mixtures had greater net returns per cow than the two‐species mixture. Wedin et al (18) reported that a simple mixture of one grass and one legume [alfalfa‐smooth bromegrass ( Bromus inermis Leyss.)] or grass+N (105 to 134 lb/acre) were more economical, in terms of milk production per acre, than a complex mixture of nine grasses and legumes.…”
Section: Whole‐farm Model Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within the four mixtures, the three‐, six‐, and nine‐species mixtures had greater net returns per cow than the two‐species mixture. Wedin et al (18) reported that a simple mixture of one grass and one legume [alfalfa‐smooth bromegrass ( Bromus inermis Leyss.)] or grass+N (105 to 134 lb/acre) were more economical, in terms of milk production per acre, than a complex mixture of nine grasses and legumes.…”
Section: Whole‐farm Model Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simulation results indicate that all forage mixtures were more economical, on a whole‐farm basis, than grass+N pasture. Milk production levels were low (35 lb/cow/day) in the Wedin et al (18) study and they conducted only a partial economic analysis. Milk production in our study was much higher (76 lb/day) and our economic analysis was more comprehensive and conducted at the whole‐farm scale, which may account for differences between the studies.…”
Section: Whole‐farm Model Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few published studies on grazing forage mixtures have dealt mostly with mixtures of one grass and one legume, with contradictory results in both dairy cattle (Wedin et al 1965;Harris et al 1997;Phillips and James 1998;Rutter et al 2004) and sheep del Pozo et al 1997;Wright et al 2001).…”
Section: Mixed Swards and Grazing Animalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), timothy (Phleum pratense L.), meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis L.), Kentucky bluegrass, and Canada bluegrass (Poa compressa L.)] than on a dual-purpose hay/pasture mixture of timothy, alfalfa, and red clover (3000 kg ha -1 ; Clark and Poincelot 1996). Grazing research with lactating dairy cows in the mid 1960s, on the other hand, indicated that there was no benefit in milk production to planting a complex mixture of grasses and legumes for grazing (Wedin et al 1965).…”
Section: Mixed Swards and Grazing Animalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixing grasses often also increases yield, but this does not always lead to higher animal productivity (Clark, 2001; Tracy and Sanderson, 2004b). Inclusion of legumes improves seasonal yield distribution of perennial cool‐season grass pastures (Hermann et al, 2002; Lauriault et al, 2005a; Leep et al, 2002) as well as overall yield and quality (Sleugh et al, 2000; Tracy and Sanderson, 2004b), which does lead to greater animal productivity (Lauriault et al, 2005a). Maintaining a sustainable balance between the grass and legume components becomes a management goal (Barker et al, 2002; Clark, 2001; Edwards et al, 1996) that is often difficult to attain (Harris et al, 1999) because of lack of persistence, which has been a limitation for forage legumes (Beuselinck et al, 1994) because of grazing and other environmental factors (Harmoney et al, 2001; Harris et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%