1969
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(69)90369-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of media used in electric pulp testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
2
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these conduction differences were found to be statistically significant. These findings are in contrast to those of Martin et al (6) and Cooley and Robison (7), who found that the type of medium used to couple the probe of the electric pulp tester to the tooth surface was not significant. One possibility for this difference could be the limited number of media they used even though they did include water as a media.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some of these conduction differences were found to be statistically significant. These findings are in contrast to those of Martin et al (6) and Cooley and Robison (7), who found that the type of medium used to couple the probe of the electric pulp tester to the tooth surface was not significant. One possibility for this difference could be the limited number of media they used even though they did include water as a media.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This being true, liquid interface media are not recommended when using EPTs. Even though liquid media are not recommended for use with EPTs, they were still included in this study as previous authors have also tested them (6,7) and we wanted to test some readily available media that are found in dental offices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The available evidence shows comparable efficacies of some interface media in the ability to transmit the electric current through tooth to the pulp both in extracted teeth (Martin et al . , Cooley & Robinson ) and clinical study (Michaelson et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1975, Cooley & Robison 1980). A laboratory study by Martin et al. (1969) concluded that the interface medium made no appreciable difference to either the voltage or the electric current transmitted.…”
Section: Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%