1959
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0381114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of MCF (Micro-Cel-Fat), A New Type of Fat Product

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparent ME values (AME) were calculated by subtracting the gross energy (GE) of excreta from GE intake and then dividing by total dry matter intake. The AME values of diets were corrected for zero nitrogen retention (AME n ) by assuming a value of 36.55 kJ g -1 of nitrogen lost or retained (Titus et al 1959). Experimental data from AID measurements were subjected to analysis of variance using the GLM procedure of SAS (1990) and using the following statistical model (Snedecor and Cochran 1989):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparent ME values (AME) were calculated by subtracting the gross energy (GE) of excreta from GE intake and then dividing by total dry matter intake. The AME values of diets were corrected for zero nitrogen retention (AME n ) by assuming a value of 36.55 kJ g -1 of nitrogen lost or retained (Titus et al 1959). Experimental data from AID measurements were subjected to analysis of variance using the GLM procedure of SAS (1990) and using the following statistical model (Snedecor and Cochran 1989):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3), N in and N out are nitrogen ingested and excreted (g), and 36.5 is the mean energy content (kJ) per gram urine-nitrogen in birds (Titus et al 1959, Sibbald 1982. Correction for nitrogen balance is needed because the energy in excreta from endogenous (2003) sources (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen retention is affected by many variables, including feed intake and composition, and may be positive or negative during a BE bioassay. Common practice is to correct AME values to zero nitrogen balance (AME") although correction to other levels of retention may be used (Peterson and Vik-Mo 1968;Hartfiel et al 1970 Zelenka (1970) concluded that AME values corrected according to Titus et al ( 1959) were demonstrably more accurate than those corrected according to Hill and Anderson (1958) A regression analysis of 1375 pairs of AME" and AME values produced a correlation coefficient of 0.995 and the equation: AME" : 0.009 + 0.948 AME which indicates that the nitrogen correction was proportional to the AME value (Sibbald and Slinger 1963c). The data were obtained with chicks but when adult cockereis were used the correction was reduced from 5 to 17o of the AME value (Sibbaid and Price 1975).…”
Section: The Nitrogen Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%