2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2017.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of ISFET sensors for coastal pH monitoring applications

Abstract: The accuracy and precision of ion sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) pH sensors have been well documented, but primarily by ocean chemistry specialists employing the technology at single locations. Here we examine their performance in a network context through comparison to discrete measurements of pH, using different configurations of the Honeywell DuraFET pH sensor deployed in six coastal settings by operators with a range of experience. Experience of the operator had the largest effect on performance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean (± SD) difference between the spectrophotometric pH T in samples and the SeaFET measures are −0.001 ± 0.012, 0.003 ± 0.050 and 0.02 ± 0.20 in the coral reef, seagrass meadow and mangrove forest, respectively (Figure S1.). The precision and accuracy of the pH T measurement in the coral reef and seagrass meadow were comparable to other studies in coastal ecosystems (McLaughlin et al, ). The precision and accuracy were, however, 1 order of magnitude lower in the mangrove forest waters, probably due to the extreme deployment conditions (high temperature and salinity, low water level with periods of emersions, exposure to sediment) and the high potential for large differences of the CO 2 system within a few cm between sampling point and sensor.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The mean (± SD) difference between the spectrophotometric pH T in samples and the SeaFET measures are −0.001 ± 0.012, 0.003 ± 0.050 and 0.02 ± 0.20 in the coral reef, seagrass meadow and mangrove forest, respectively (Figure S1.). The precision and accuracy of the pH T measurement in the coral reef and seagrass meadow were comparable to other studies in coastal ecosystems (McLaughlin et al, ). The precision and accuracy were, however, 1 order of magnitude lower in the mangrove forest waters, probably due to the extreme deployment conditions (high temperature and salinity, low water level with periods of emersions, exposure to sediment) and the high potential for large differences of the CO 2 system within a few cm between sampling point and sensor.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…To compare benthic relationships between pH, oxygen, and in situ temperature inside and outside of a kelp forest, SeapHOx R sensors (equipped with a Honeywell DuraFET R III pH electrode, an Aanderaa R 3835 oxygen optode, and Seabird R SBE-37 microCAT CTD) (Martz et al, 2010;McLaughlin et al, 2017) were deployed 1 m off the bottom at both the inside and outside spar buoy locations for 4 weeks (March 10-April 08, 2015). Sensors were programmed to log every 20 min.…”
Section: Sensor Deployment 2: Comparing Benthic Ph-oxygen Relationshimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wanninkhof et al (2013) have provided further guidance on incorporating in situ sensors into the SOCAT QC framework, including details such as degree of in situ calibration necessary for desired confidence and levels of accuracy. A number of published papers address practical suggestions and demonstrations for Durafet R pH sensor QC (Bresnahan et al, 2014;Johnson et al, 2016;Rérolle et al, 2016;McLaughlin et al, 2017;Gonski et al, 2018;Miller et al, 2018). Similarly, there is considerable ongoing research into complications with in situ spectrophotometric pH analyzers, especially those resulting from indicator dye impurities and the moving parts within these systems (e.g., Liu et al, 2011;Lai et al, 2018).…”
Section: What Are the Factors Limiting The Precision Accuracy And Rementioning
confidence: 99%