2023
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30080518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Interactive mHealth Applications for Adults Living with Cancer

Sydney Wasserman,
Lydia Ould Brahim,
Ameer Attiya
et al.

Abstract: This study evaluated the quality and usefulness of interactive mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) for adults with cancer. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to add rigor to the search, as well as to the data collection and analysis. The apps available in the most used app stores (Google Play and Apple) with interactive tailored features were identified. To supplement this, a Google web search was also conducted. The apps were evaluated for their quality using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An app may be highly functional and aesthetically professional but lacks the specific flexibility and informative quality for caregivers, patients, or both. Lower scores for engagement are consistent with other studies in the literature that used MARS for oncology app interventions [32]. Additionally, the developers tendency to focus on implementation rather than building evidence-based features highlights a trend of understudied interventions on the market today [33].…”
Section: Quality Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…An app may be highly functional and aesthetically professional but lacks the specific flexibility and informative quality for caregivers, patients, or both. Lower scores for engagement are consistent with other studies in the literature that used MARS for oncology app interventions [32]. Additionally, the developers tendency to focus on implementation rather than building evidence-based features highlights a trend of understudied interventions on the market today [33].…”
Section: Quality Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For patients and healthcare professionals, the main clinical challenges are treatment adherence, symptom monitoring, symptom management, social support, and self-efficacy. Empowering oncology patients using digital technologies has been recognized as a promising strategy to improve therapy outcomes [98][99][100][101][102][103][104].…”
Section: Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%