2015
DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of fresh gas flow rates for spontaneously breathing cats and small dogs on the Humphrey ADE semi-closed breathing system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fresh gas flow of 1 L/min (≥200 ml/kg/min) was allocated for these animals, as this flow rate would likely be sufficient to avoid rebreathing even if minute ventilation increased during the anaesthetic (Walsh & Taylor 2004, Gale et al . 2015). For animals under 5 kg requiring mechanical ventilation, they were assigned to the integrated circle system of an anaesthetic workstation with 15 mm internal diameter smooth bore tubing in line with normal hospital practice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A fresh gas flow of 1 L/min (≥200 ml/kg/min) was allocated for these animals, as this flow rate would likely be sufficient to avoid rebreathing even if minute ventilation increased during the anaesthetic (Walsh & Taylor 2004, Gale et al . 2015). For animals under 5 kg requiring mechanical ventilation, they were assigned to the integrated circle system of an anaesthetic workstation with 15 mm internal diameter smooth bore tubing in line with normal hospital practice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where this is not possible lower‐flow non‐rebreathing systems, such as the miniature parallel Lack or Humphrey ADE, offer a viable alternative (Walsh & Taylor 2004, Gale et al . 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%