1986
DOI: 10.1080/05698198608981674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Finite Difference and Finite Element Methods for the Solution of the Reynolds Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much research considers only the linear first order approximations while others consider higher order approximation (Lund 1965, Lund and Thomsen 1978, Qiu and Tieu 1996, Miura et al 2017. There are different methods to obtain the bearing coefficients,such as, experimental (Tiwari et al 2004, Mao et al 2016analytical (Chasalevris andSfyris, Wang andKhonsari 2006, Miraskari et al 2018a), finite difference method(FDM) (Gero and McC. Ettles 1986, Qiu and Tieu 1995, Goodwin et al 1997, finite element method (FEM) (Wada et al 1971, Mourelatos 1985, Arregui and Vázquez 2001, Nair and Nair 2004, Awasthi et al 2006, Hili et al 2010 , mesh less method with radial basis (MMRB) (Nicoletti 2013) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (Gao et al 2014, Zhang et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research considers only the linear first order approximations while others consider higher order approximation (Lund 1965, Lund and Thomsen 1978, Qiu and Tieu 1996, Miura et al 2017. There are different methods to obtain the bearing coefficients,such as, experimental (Tiwari et al 2004, Mao et al 2016analytical (Chasalevris andSfyris, Wang andKhonsari 2006, Miraskari et al 2018a), finite difference method(FDM) (Gero and McC. Ettles 1986, Qiu and Tieu 1995, Goodwin et al 1997, finite element method (FEM) (Wada et al 1971, Mourelatos 1985, Arregui and Vázquez 2001, Nair and Nair 2004, Awasthi et al 2006, Hili et al 2010 , mesh less method with radial basis (MMRB) (Nicoletti 2013) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (Gao et al 2014, Zhang et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1985, Gero and Ettles [6] evaluated the relative precision of the FDM and FEM approaches when applied to a steady, isoviscous, incompressible lubrication problem. In their study, it was assumed that the solution of a complicated coupled problem could be derived by solving a sequential series of simple, uncoupled, steady problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 conducted stability analysis of a rigid rotor supporting hydrodynamic journal bearings with rough surfaces using a stochastic FEM. Gero and Ettles 11 conducted a comparison between FDM and FEM for a two-dimensional steady-state, isoviscous, and incompressible lubrication problem, from which the results showed that the former one has both a smaller relative error and a higher efficiency. Tala-Ighil and Fillon 12 studied the thermal effect with a numerical approach of FDM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%