2011
DOI: 10.1108/s1477-4070(2011)0000008009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Financial Analysts and Naïve Methods in Forecasting Long-Term Earnings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0
42

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
21
0
42
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we follow the same methodology with one contextspecific difference: Brazilian market has one of the lowest analyst coverages in the world (Bae, Tan, & Welker, 2008). Moreover, several recent studies show that analyst forecasts can be as biased as simple extrapolations (Bradshaw, Drake, Myers, & Myers, 2012;Lacina, Lee, & Xu, 2011). To address both issues (low analyst coverage and biased forecasts) and consistent with Fisher (1930) and Graham and McGowan (2005), we assume that future stock prices can be expressed with a price-level correction (inflation rate) plus a real growth output (based on gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate).…”
Section: Empirical Implementation Of the Valuation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we follow the same methodology with one contextspecific difference: Brazilian market has one of the lowest analyst coverages in the world (Bae, Tan, & Welker, 2008). Moreover, several recent studies show that analyst forecasts can be as biased as simple extrapolations (Bradshaw, Drake, Myers, & Myers, 2012;Lacina, Lee, & Xu, 2011). To address both issues (low analyst coverage and biased forecasts) and consistent with Fisher (1930) and Graham and McGowan (2005), we assume that future stock prices can be expressed with a price-level correction (inflation rate) plus a real growth output (based on gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate).…”
Section: Empirical Implementation Of the Valuation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Easton and Monahan (2005) find a negative correlation between analyst-based COE and realized stock returns and attribute the anomalous relationship to the biases in analysts' earnings forecasts. As forecast horizons expand, the quality of analysts' forecasts, including their LTG forecasts, become less reliable (Bradshaw et al 2012;Lacina et al 2010). Thus, we expect that in the estimation of cost of equity, using a better quality prediction of long-term growth in place of LTG will yield better quality outcomes.…”
Section: Estimate the Cost Of Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance of the study lays on the fact that recent evidence in Freeman, Koch and Li (2011) shows that historical ERCs are useful in predicting future returns-earnings relations. Additionally, recent evidence in Bradshaw et al (2012) and Lacina, Lee and Xu (2011) shows that earnings forecast based on time-series estimation are more accurate than analysts' forecasts, consequently being better inputs for stock valuation purposes. Similarly, Dalmácio et al (2013), Martinez and Dumer (2012) and Saito, Villalobos and Benetti (2008) document significant errors and biases in analysts' projections for Brazilian firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%