2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03571-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy delivered remotely during the Covid–19 pandemic

Abstract: Background In addition to having a negative impact on the physical and emotional health of the population, the global Covid–19 pandemic has necessitated psychotherapists moving their practice to online environments. This service evaluation examines the efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) Therapy delivered via the internet. Methods A real–world service evaluation was conducted from a self–selecting group of EMDR therapis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the final stages of the trial coincided with the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, meaning four subjects received part of the treatment online. We could not find any research comparing online and face-to-face psychotherapy in BD patients, but EMDR has been shown to be effective delivered online (McGowan et al, 2021), and the pandemic affected both treatment arms equally. A third limitation is the concomitant pharmacotherapy which may have had confounding effects, although there were no significant between-group differences in pharmacological treatment.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Secondly, the final stages of the trial coincided with the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, meaning four subjects received part of the treatment online. We could not find any research comparing online and face-to-face psychotherapy in BD patients, but EMDR has been shown to be effective delivered online (McGowan et al, 2021), and the pandemic affected both treatment arms equally. A third limitation is the concomitant pharmacotherapy which may have had confounding effects, although there were no significant between-group differences in pharmacological treatment.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Flowchart of the systematic review process. (30). A total of 33 therapists provided data on 93 different clients.…”
Section: Identification Of Studies Via Databases and Registersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of the literature on the psychological impacts and interventions of the pandemic era has been mainly directed towards health care workers and special populations (David et al, 2021; Liu et al, 2021; Rodrigues et al, 2021). A few studies have been published about the psychotherapies in use, specifically about the role of mindfulness (Kang et al, 2021; Osman et al, 2021), crisis intervention psychotherapy (Feinstein, 2021), cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) (Lewis et al, 2020) and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) (Bongaerts et al, 2021; Fogliato et al, 2022; McGowan et al, 2021). Mindfulness, defined as ‘the awareness that emerges through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally to the unfolding of experience moment by moment’, has emerged as a valid intervention for targeting symptoms of avoidance and negative cognitions, including self‐blame, shame and guilt among PTSD patients (Banks et al, 2015; Kabat‐Zinn, 2003).…”
Section: Rationale and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%