2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2019.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of deep learning based object detection strategies for threat object detection in baggage security imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mAP achieved for maturity stage classification using Resnet-101 was 81.5% which is greater than the 68% accuracy reported in another study [14]. A model was designed in [15] to perform threat object detection using faster R-CNN and YOLO. The performance is studied on 4 classes of threat objects: i) Gun, ii) Shuriken, iii) Razor-blade, iv) Knife.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The mAP achieved for maturity stage classification using Resnet-101 was 81.5% which is greater than the 68% accuracy reported in another study [14]. A model was designed in [15] to perform threat object detection using faster R-CNN and YOLO. The performance is studied on 4 classes of threat objects: i) Gun, ii) Shuriken, iii) Razor-blade, iv) Knife.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The comparison is reported in Table II, where it can be seen that the proposed framework outperforms its competitors by 5.35% in terms of recall and 2.68% in terms of F-score. Also, it is worth noting that the proposed framework although lags from YOLOv2 [27] by 0.988% in terms of accuracy, it beats YOLOv2 [27] by 4.61% in terms of F-score, which is more promising considering the fact that accuracy is vulnerable against the imbalanced data (especially for recognizing true negatives 'background' pixels) compared to the F-score. Apart from this, the proposed framework also outperformed state-of-the-art occlusion-aware dual tensor-shot detector (DTSD) framework [29] by 2.6% and Cascaded Structure Tensor framework [11] by 1.22% in terms of mAP scores, as evident from Table III.…”
Section: B Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the second set of evaluations, we compared the proposed framework's detection performance to that of state-of-the-art baggage threat detection frameworks like CST [11], DTSD [29], and the YOLOv2 [27], and Tiny YOLO [27] based scheme proposed in [27]. The comparison is reported in Table II, where it can be seen that the proposed framework outperforms its competitors by 5.35% in terms of recall and 2.68% in terms of F-score.…”
Section: B Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from this, Xiao et al [70] presented an efficient implementation of Faster R-CNN [12] to detect suspicious data from the TeraHertz imagery. Dhiraj et al [71] used Faster R-CNN [12], YOLOv2 [64], and Tiny YOLO [64] to screen baggage threats contained within the scans of a publicly available GDXray dataset [72]. Gaus et al [10] utilized RetinaNet [13], Faster R-CNN [12], Mask R-CNN [11] (driven through ResNets [73], VGG-16 [74],…”
Section: Supervised Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%