1984
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.143.3.675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of computer-assisted instruction in radiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Web-based tutorials provide learners with the opportunity to complete the material at their own speeds 16,17 and at their own convenience [16][17][18] and have been shown to be an effective educational strategy to enhance knowledge of a given topic. 4,[19][20][21] Tutorials offer concise instructions and allow the learner to return as needed and to view the information numerous times to ensure comprehension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Web-based tutorials provide learners with the opportunity to complete the material at their own speeds 16,17 and at their own convenience [16][17][18] and have been shown to be an effective educational strategy to enhance knowledge of a given topic. 4,[19][20][21] Tutorials offer concise instructions and allow the learner to return as needed and to view the information numerous times to ensure comprehension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Details of the search strategy are included in the .) Even though his search strategy failed to identify any studies that specifically compared the computer‐based lecture to the standard lecture, the search provided information on how a technology‐based substitution compared with the “live” lecture 16–24 (Table 1).…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of “Live” Versus Computer‐basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies to date have compared computer‐assisted instruction (CAI) without tutors to small‐group tutorial sessions (Kenny & Schmulian 1979; Jacoby et al 1984; Parish 1986; Day & Payne 1987; Garret et al 1987).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%