1970
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(70)80108-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of Anti-Diuretic Hormone in intravenous urography “sniff urography”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been confirmed by Cattell et aE. (1970) and it has also been shown to produce greater urinary radio-opacity in matched iirographic studies (Benness, 1970). An extension of this concept to include the larger radio-opaque molecules is illustrated in Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been confirmed by Cattell et aE. (1970) and it has also been shown to produce greater urinary radio-opacity in matched iirographic studies (Benness, 1970). An extension of this concept to include the larger radio-opaque molecules is illustrated in Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The final concentration of the agent in the urine depends on the tubular reabsorbtion of water and electrolytes. This is enhanced by preliminary dehydration, the use of antidiuretic hormone, and sodium-linked contrast agents (Benness, 1967(Benness, , 1968(Benness, , 1970. However, the final urinary concentration of the agent is limited by the marked increase in the urinary solute output associated with the excretion of the contrast agent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%