2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of an automated 4D-CT contour propagation tool to define an internal gross tumour volume for lung cancer radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Manual delineating on each phase of 4DCT would consume lots of time. Automated 4DCT propagation tools could significantly decrease GTV delineating time, without significantly decreasing the inter- and intra- observer variability [27]. Additionally, it is impossible to avoid the impact of registration error on the comparison of MI or DI between GTV-3D and 4D targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual delineating on each phase of 4DCT would consume lots of time. Automated 4DCT propagation tools could significantly decrease GTV delineating time, without significantly decreasing the inter- and intra- observer variability [27]. Additionally, it is impossible to avoid the impact of registration error on the comparison of MI or DI between GTV-3D and 4D targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DSC ranges from 0 (no overlap between T and D ) to 1 ( T and D are identical). A DSC value of greater than 0.7, which denotes a good agreement between T and D , has been generally accepted in the medical field [1618]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface detection is performed for each triangle center and achieved by maximizing a cost function that evaluates displacements along the triangle normal to deform to a feature based on grey-scale value transitions while simultaneously restricting large displacement vectors (Kaus et al 2004). This deformable model-based method was chosen as it was integrated into the Pinnacle Treatment Planning System 9.1y (Philips Medical Systems, Fitchburg, WI) analogous to the work by Gaede et al (Gaede et al 2011). No auto-segmented volumes in this study were subject to any form of observer review to allow for unbiased assessment of the auto-segmentation accuracy.…”
Section: Auto-segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%