2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of alternative measures of accessibility for investigating potential ‘deprivation amplification’ in service provision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, the 2SFCA method considers the geographical distribution of patients and physicians. Another advantage of this method is that the method can control capacity restrictions, local competition for services, and cross-border healthcare-seeking behavior ( Neutens, 2015 ; Page et al, 2018 ). However, the method also has a limitation, which is the overestimation of patient demand since local needs are redundantly calculated at the physician locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, the 2SFCA method considers the geographical distribution of patients and physicians. Another advantage of this method is that the method can control capacity restrictions, local competition for services, and cross-border healthcare-seeking behavior ( Neutens, 2015 ; Page et al, 2018 ). However, the method also has a limitation, which is the overestimation of patient demand since local needs are redundantly calculated at the physician locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the above methods take into account the relationship between supply and demand [18]. Therefore, with the development of GIS techniques and tools, the 2S floating catchment area (2SFCA) method, based on the gravity model, has been used more and more often to test access to medical services [18,19,26]. This method, despite its numerous advantages, may overestimate local demand for services, leading to a disturbance in the demand-supply ratio [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For greater accuracy of analysis, the locations of the points were based on the locations of the main settlement names from the National Register of Geographic Names. Such names were usually located in the centre of the largest settlement, which, in the absence of more detailed population data, had a similar effect as the population weighted centroid determination used by Page et al [18]. In total, the research covered 41,603 rural statistical localities.…”
Section: Localitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the scarcity or low credibility of relevant data, it is infeasible to include such information in the analysis of road network data. In the evaluation of factors that affect geographic accessibility, the study took reference from the research method of Page et al [ 28 ]. While retrieving data for the analysis of transportation influencing factors, the road network data in government open data representing actual route distances were adopted instead of the traditional map distances (the linear distance between two points) to reduce the error.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%