2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of adaptive planning by assessing the dosimetric impact of weight loss throughout the course of radiotherapy in bilateral treatment of head and neck cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the effectiveness of ART for both IMRT and VMAT plans, Stauch et al showed that there is no significant difference between the two techniques. However, tissue loss in HNC may have a greater effect on IMRT treatment plans when checking the plan because the number of checkpoints at which measurements are made for the plan verification is lower compared to VMAT [ 11 ]. Thomson et al also did not find significant differences in the robustness of the plan between IMRT and VMAT in the head and neck area of patients that required replanning due to weight loss [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the effectiveness of ART for both IMRT and VMAT plans, Stauch et al showed that there is no significant difference between the two techniques. However, tissue loss in HNC may have a greater effect on IMRT treatment plans when checking the plan because the number of checkpoints at which measurements are made for the plan verification is lower compared to VMAT [ 11 ]. Thomson et al also did not find significant differences in the robustness of the plan between IMRT and VMAT in the head and neck area of patients that required replanning due to weight loss [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant weight loss during treatment can result in ill-fitting masks and therefore risks treatment being stopped and/or re-planned. 28 Therefore, any deficit should be identified early and patients should be reviewed by the dietitian at least once a week, ideally twiceweekly during treatment. 9 Dietitians also support the MDT in encouraging adherence to treatments, such as analgesia, to alleviate side effects and in turn, optimise tolerance to nutrition support.…”
Section: On-treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Hunter et al concluded that replanning is unlikely to improve salivary output after treatment in most cases even though replanning can reduce the mean dose to the parotids basically because of the importance of the remaining function of the other salivary glands [ 44 ]. Stauch et al investigated the dosimetric impact of weight loss and anatomical separation difference in head and neck (H&N) patients and examined the effectiveness of adaptive planning and compared VMAT and IMRT adaptive plans [ 45 ]. Despite some differences, were found: the mean weight loss was 9% and the mean anatomical difference measured in nine vectors in levels of C1, C3, and C4/5 was 1.06 cm, the coverage of all targets improved on average regarding both VMAT and IMRT.…”
Section: Hypoxia In Head and Neck Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No quantitative method for finding the threshold of anatomical separation difference requiring a replanning was established. Since weight loss is a gradual process and the true overdosing is even smaller than in the time of replanning and the changes in organ dose were marginal, authors conclude that adaptive radiotherapy may not always be necessary when the alignment of bony anatomy and remaining soft tissue is within tolerance and physician judgment and preference is still needed [ 45 ]. Despite the various facts concerning adaptation, its importance stands out even more in the case of further dose intensification.…”
Section: Hypoxia In Head and Neck Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%