2012
DOI: 10.1097/ncq.0b013e31825f4a5f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of a Sitter Reduction Program Intervention

Abstract: Hospitals use sitters as an alternative to reduce patient falls. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a sitter reduction program by examining the differences between sitter use and falls in an acute care hospital. Findings indicate that a significant decrease in sitter use and falls remained constant. Reducing sitter use is possible without significantly increasing fall rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the sitter role on healthcare costs is significant . Previous studies exploring strategies to decrease the use of sitters because of the high cost and distruption of staff responsibilities are numerous . Although a cost effectiveness analysis was beyond the scope of this study, our model suggests a cost benefit stemming from the shorter stay and less use of CO or sitters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of the sitter role on healthcare costs is significant . Previous studies exploring strategies to decrease the use of sitters because of the high cost and distruption of staff responsibilities are numerous . Although a cost effectiveness analysis was beyond the scope of this study, our model suggests a cost benefit stemming from the shorter stay and less use of CO or sitters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,21,45 Previous studies exploring strategies to decrease the use of sitters because of the high cost and distruption of staff responsibilities are numerous. 10,[24][25][26][27][28][29] Although a cost effectiveness analysis was beyond the scope of this study, our model suggests a cost benefit stemming from the shorter stay and less use of CO or sitters. With regard to LOS, assuming a cost of $304 per day per person for the unit, the daily cost savings is $2,432 ($887,680 per year), with 576 bed days (0.8 3 720 patients over 1 year).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Spiva, L., Feiner, T., Jones, D., Hunter, D., Petefish, J., & Vanbrackle, L. (2012). An evaluation of a sitter reduction programme intervention.…”
Section: Saundersmentioning
confidence: 99%