2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/735719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation Methodology Development and Application Process for Severe Accident Safety Issue Resolution

Abstract: A general evaluation methodology development and application process (EMDAP) paradigm is described for the resolution of severe accident safety issues. For the broader objective of complete and comprehensive design validation, severe accident safety issues are resolved by demonstrating comprehensive severe-accident-related engineering through applicable testing programs, process studies demonstrating certain deterministic elements, probabilistic risk assessment, and severe accident management guidelines. The b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the emphasis of the safety analysis is on a deterministic evaluation that safety criteria are met, concerns relating to overall plant safety and the risk impact of power uprates also require that the safety margins be evaluated with Probabilistic Safety Analysis (PSA) methods (Martin, 2012). This is necessary to support and supplement deterministic analysis, technical judgment and to enable risk informed decision making process.…”
Section: Safety Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the emphasis of the safety analysis is on a deterministic evaluation that safety criteria are met, concerns relating to overall plant safety and the risk impact of power uprates also require that the safety margins be evaluated with Probabilistic Safety Analysis (PSA) methods (Martin, 2012). This is necessary to support and supplement deterministic analysis, technical judgment and to enable risk informed decision making process.…”
Section: Safety Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Erbacher & Leistikow, 1985) La evaluación preliminar de los posibles estados de daño del núcleo de un BWR proporcionará suficiente información para la resolución de problemas graves de seguridad en accidentes. (Martin, 2012) Se presentó una simulación hipotética de un LOCA con SBO y sin inyección de agua de refrigeración con la propuesta de evaluar la distribución de temperatura y el calentamiento de la parte inferior de la RPV. El código SCDAPSIM/RELAP5 3.2 se usó para construir el modelo del BWR y realizar la simulación numérica.…”
unclassified