2011
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-28132011000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evacuation building project for Cascadia earthquakes and tsunamis

Abstract: This paper discusses the need for a tsunami evacuation building (TEB) as a new risk management approach to Cascadia earthquakes and tsunamis. Taking its starting point from FEMA P646 (2008) guidelines for design of structures for evacuation from tsunamis, it looks at how this approach would work for rebuilding the Cannon Beach City Hall as a TEB. Geotechnical, structural and hydraulic designs and technical issues are considered in the project. The paper gives the outline for a future feasibility study that wou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where speedy evacuation is not possible because of long travel distance to higher grounds it makes sense to consider building tsunami evacuation buildings (TEBs) instead. In a recent geotechnical study, Raskin et al (2011) present the conceptional design of a tsunami resistant City Hall that serves also as evacuation shelter at Cannon Beach in the state of Oregon. It is the first of its kind in the US and is believed to become a model for more TEBs in other coastal areas.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where speedy evacuation is not possible because of long travel distance to higher grounds it makes sense to consider building tsunami evacuation buildings (TEBs) instead. In a recent geotechnical study, Raskin et al (2011) present the conceptional design of a tsunami resistant City Hall that serves also as evacuation shelter at Cannon Beach in the state of Oregon. It is the first of its kind in the US and is believed to become a model for more TEBs in other coastal areas.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, placing F I G U R E 5 The FN-curves for placing a VES at three different locations: (A), (B), and (C) show FN-curves for VES(a), VES(b), and VES(c) in Figure 3, respectively. Panel (D) depicts the average Relative EV of risk by different percentages of population who consider VES as an evacuation option, taking 0% as the base case in calculating Relative EV a VES near high ground shelters is counterintuitive (Raskin et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Repercussion Of Unthoughtful Ves Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also provide refuges to individuals when early warning systems are unavailable, such as in the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami (Lindell et al., 2019). The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provides basic guidelines for VES placement based on travel time (Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2012), but these guidelines do not consider resource limitations, available space (Raskin et al., 2011), site‐specific inundation dynamics, social aspects of evacuee decision‐making processes, or economic constraints (Raskin & Wang, 2017). Recent studies have explored means to determine optimal VES locations for tsunami evacuations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary studies have been done in an effort to develop design criteria for tsunami evacuation shelters (e.g. Yeh 2005, FEMA P646 2008, Pimanmas 2010, Raskin 2011, near-shore structures (e.g. Palermo 2009), and bridges (e.g.…”
Section: Current Design Provisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%