2015 12th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technolo 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ecticon.2015.7207049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An EV quick charging station using a pulse frequency current control technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature six puts forward a kind of pulse frequency current control technique. When the state of charge(SOC) raises from 20% to 80%, it takes approximately 16 minutes, and the temperature rise is less than 4℃ [6]. As shown in fig.5, compared with constant voltage mode, pulse frequency charge is much quicker and the charging time could be less than 20 minutes.…”
Section: Discussion About Applied Technology 51 Quick Charging Techmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature six puts forward a kind of pulse frequency current control technique. When the state of charge(SOC) raises from 20% to 80%, it takes approximately 16 minutes, and the temperature rise is less than 4℃ [6]. As shown in fig.5, compared with constant voltage mode, pulse frequency charge is much quicker and the charging time could be less than 20 minutes.…”
Section: Discussion About Applied Technology 51 Quick Charging Techmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4: charging mode, discharging mode, and idle mode. Charging mode will operate Q 1 converter for desired current and voltage command from an EV via CAN bus and CHAdeMO protocol; whereas, the discharging mode will operate Q 2 converter and turning on an IGBT for releasing energy back to the grid for performing pulse charging technique as reported in [9]. The idle mode will operate during resting time if the temperature of the battery is increasing over than threshold value which is 5 o C for Nissan LEAF case.…”
Section: Proposed Circuit Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of this study is a higher degradation of the electrodes in the case of the PC protocol. However, by adapting the pulse frequency, it has been demonstrated the effectiveness of this protocol in comparison with the CCCV method in terms of charging time and battery lifetime [5,6,7,8]. It can be also observed that by modifying the relaxation time and current amplitude during the charging stage, it is possible to minimize the concentration polarization and optimize the charging process [6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%