2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-016-0027-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An EU Recycling Target: What Does the Dutch Evidence Tell Us?

Abstract: The European Union (EU) advocates a household waste recycling rate of more than 65 %. Although the Netherlands has already invested heavily in recycling policies, this is still a big challenge as nowadays this rate is approximately 50 % on average and very few no municipalities have a rate above 65 %. Given this practice, it is possible to learn from the Dutch experience which policies are effective in increasing recycling rates. Based on a large panel data set for the Netherlands, we show that unit-based pric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Bel and Gradus (2016), such a difference is likely to exist mainly when volume pricing is represented by containers, as in Fullerton and Kinnaman (1996), instead of smaller units such as bags, as in this case. Considering for instance the case of The Netherlands, no difference between weight and bag pricing is found in Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2004) and Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2009), while some divergence is documented in Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2015), favourable to weight programs, and Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2016), favourable to bag programs.…”
Section: Administrative Datamentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As noted by Bel and Gradus (2016), such a difference is likely to exist mainly when volume pricing is represented by containers, as in Fullerton and Kinnaman (1996), instead of smaller units such as bags, as in this case. Considering for instance the case of The Netherlands, no difference between weight and bag pricing is found in Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2004) and Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2009), while some divergence is documented in Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2015), favourable to weight programs, and Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2016), favourable to bag programs.…”
Section: Administrative Datamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In some cases, ambitious recycling targets have been set. The European Union, for instance, would like its households to recycle 65% or more of their garbage, on average a 15% increase compared to current levels (Dijkgraaf and Gradus, 2016). Similarly, in Switzerland household waste recycling targets at the Cantonal level can be at 60% or more.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it is important to collect more detailed information on other environmental decisions as well. Dijkgraaf and Gradus (2017) show an increasing number of municipalities with curbside collecting of recyclables and special type of containers. In some municipalities, curbside collection of recyclables has expanded and households have to bring unsorted waste to pick-up points.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recovery of the recyclable material, in particular packaging waste, has been highlighted also within the last circular economy package published in 2018 [1][2][3]. Thus, the implementation of integrated systems for improving the recycling rate in MSW and packaging waste increased of importance for the countries forming part the European Union (EU) [4][5][6][7]. North of Italy is one of the regions that achieved the highest recycling rate in Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%