2007
DOI: 10.4018/jthi.2007070106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ethnographic Study of Is Investment Appraisal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms previous findings (Elbanna, 2010) that projects are not fully defined entities, which makes comparison between projects even more difficult. In addition, underlying project complexities increase the perceived uncertainty of a project's outcome (Howcroft and McDonald, 2007). This was most clearly observed in Department A.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Findings And Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This confirms previous findings (Elbanna, 2010) that projects are not fully defined entities, which makes comparison between projects even more difficult. In addition, underlying project complexities increase the perceived uncertainty of a project's outcome (Howcroft and McDonald, 2007). This was most clearly observed in Department A.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Findings And Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These methods, however, have been subject to extended criticism due to their narrow perspective on the nature and impacts of IT (Ballantine et al, 1999;Smithson and Hirschheim, 1998;Howcroft and McDonald, 2007). A number of researchers argue that the IT evaluation process is subjective and contextual (Smithson and Hirschheim, 1998;Farbey et al, 1999;Howcroft and McDonald, 2007) as well as political (Wilson and Howcroft, 2005).…”
Section: Prior Research On It Project Prioritizationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations