1988
DOI: 10.1016/0889-4906(88)90026-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ethnographic approach to syllabus design: A case study of the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Cumaranatunge (1988) consulted Sri Lankan domestic aids through various qualitative and quantitative methods (questionnaires, structured interviews, and participant observation) and conducted structured or informal interviews across both in-service and domain expert sources (e.g., domestic aids, agencies and employers, government officials). Similarly, Ramani, Chacko, Singh, and Glendinning (1988) employed non-participant observation and unstructured interviews with the same source (pre-service science and technology students) and conducted interviews across two sources (students and domain-expert scientists). Table 2 shows the target learner population, context, sources, methods, and triangulation of sources and/or methods reported in twenty-three studies published between 2000 and 2014.…”
Section: A Survey Of Methodological Practice In Needs Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cumaranatunge (1988) consulted Sri Lankan domestic aids through various qualitative and quantitative methods (questionnaires, structured interviews, and participant observation) and conducted structured or informal interviews across both in-service and domain expert sources (e.g., domestic aids, agencies and employers, government officials). Similarly, Ramani, Chacko, Singh, and Glendinning (1988) employed non-participant observation and unstructured interviews with the same source (pre-service science and technology students) and conducted interviews across two sources (students and domain-expert scientists). Table 2 shows the target learner population, context, sources, methods, and triangulation of sources and/or methods reported in twenty-three studies published between 2000 and 2014.…”
Section: A Survey Of Methodological Practice In Needs Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations were done with the aim of collecting discourse samples of authentic tasks and to gain further insights into the language needs of receptionists (for studies which used these methods, see e.g. Cameron, 1998; Chew, 2005; Cowling, 2007; Evans, 2013; Jasso-Aguilar, 1999, 2005; Li So-mui & Mead, 2000; Ramani, Chacko, Singh & Glendinning, 1998; Sullivan & Girginer, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the EAP research tradition, this approach has been influential particularly for the exploration into students' and lecturers' perceptions of their experiences in the target language use situations (e.g. Jacobson, 1987;Ramani et al, 1988;Northcott, 2001;Morita, 2000Morita, , 2004. The current research follows this tradition to reveal the insiders' perspectives of how peer interaction can constitute the medium of learning in postgraduate education.…”
Section: Overview Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%