An ethics of HPV vaccination: beyond principlism

Stoeklé, Henri‐Corto; Sekkate, Sakina; Ayoubi, Jean-Marc; Beuzeboc, Philippe; Hervé, Christian

doi:10.1080/21645515.2022.2082793

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At least in medicine and biology, this ethical theory is closely related to another theory, global bioethics, but with several new conceptual and methodological developments [ 11 ]. We believe that, within medicine and biology , these common ethical purposes and/or consequences relate principally to improving the happiness and/or survival of people and/or societies, taking into account different individual and/or collective criteria of happiness and/or survival (e.g.…”

Section: Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Good practice in medicine and biology: scientific integrity needs global bioethics

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We consider scientific integrity to constitute a new theory of morality of science, in a very specific deontological sense. Indeed, at least in practice, scientific integrity extends beyond scientific concerns, seeking to develop specific moral duties and/or procedures based on general moral values and/or standards, leading to common moral frameworks for usual scientific practices. This is, of course, necessary. Contemporary history has shown us only too well that usual scientific practices need common moral frameworks, especially in medicine and biology. However, like scientific practices, and medical and biological practices in particular, the persistence of certain moral values and/or standards and the priority attributed to them, can change significantly, due to changes in society, people, the times and/or environments, and they may be under strong tension. We therefore believe that a new theory of ethics of science, in a very specific teleological sense, may be required in this case, particularly in medicine and biology, in addition to scientific integrity. This ethical theory, through research, professionals and structures in ethics of science also called medical ethics, research ethics or bioethics in the fields of medicine and biology, should seek to identify and find specific ethical solutions to these tensions, applicable at a particular place and time, based on common ethical purposes and/or consequences. As a result, these specific ethical solutions may, or may not, lead to an evolution of common moral frameworks, which may, or may not, be developed on the basis of scientific integrity. In the fields of medicine and biology, this ethical theory is closely related to another theory, global bioethics, but with a number of new conceptual and methodological developments.

show abstract

Section: Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Good practice in medicine and biology: scientific integrity needs global bioethics

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This request led to the scheduling of the so-called "emergency" multidisciplinary team meeting (MTM), the principle of which was subsequently described in various scientific journals. 4,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The general idea was to expand the fields of competence and knowledge of "classic" MTMs, 19 which are limited to only a few medical specialties (e.g. oncology, radiology, etc.…”

Section: First Wave Of the Covid-19 Pandemicmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…By extending the meaning of quality of life to include happiness , while taking into account the spatial and temporal variability of the objective and subjective criteria for happiness and survival , this ethical theory, in our opinion, takes into account the cultural diversity of humanity, and its concrete material and intangible needs more effectively. 17…”

Section: Global Bioethicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bioethics after the COVID-19 pandemic: More research, fewer committees?

Stoeklé

Hervé

2022

Clinical Ethics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the face of the pandemic, bioethics, once again, proved its scientific utility. In France, in particular, the academic approach (= peer-reviewed, scientific publications, etc.) should be given priority over the institutional approach (= public surveys, public meetings, etc.), in hospitals, research institutes, universities, and companies, with the professionalization that this would imply (i.e. bioethicists).

show abstract