Abstract:Science and medicine have been cast as disenchanted arenas of modernity, even as scholars have illustrated the many enchantments of everyday life. Taking these conversations into the context of experimental paediatric medicine, I explore the dis/enchantments produced through the research ethics systems that govern interactions between medical practitioners and patients' families. Research ethics enact forms of disenchantment, aiming to produce the informed patient-subject who can knowingly submit to the unknow… Show more
“…This did not, however, prevent her from breaking down in the aftermath. Rather than recovering the comfortable moral world, the negative result evoked a moral and emotional breakdown (compare Addison 2022) and a spell of further ethical labor, riddling the taken‐for‐granted moral assumptions about what constitutes appropriate parental demeanor in the face of tentative disability with tension 16…”
Section: Nipt As An “Ethical Turn”: Post‐diagnostic Evaluations and M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, fetal death is acknowledged with a death certificate from as early as twelve weeks of gestation. In the hospital where Ivry conducted field work, the death of a fetus was recognized and commemorated with a structured ritual that Courtney Addison (2022, 268) might identify as an “enchanting turn.” The mid‐wives dress the dead baby in a tiny cotton kimono and arrange it in a special box surrounded with origami flowers. The parents, accompanied by the medical staff, carry the box down a side corridor to a quiet circular room with no religious symbols where they light incense and pray silently.…”
Section: Nipt As An “Ethical Turn”: Post‐diagnostic Evaluations and M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the auspices of structural ambivalence, genetic counseling becomes dedicated to creating space for prospective parents’ ethical deliberations no less than providing them with accessible scientific knowledge (compare Addison 2022). Patients must make up their own minds, but counselors are committed to support their pre‐diagnostic deliberations in preparation for possible future strife.…”
Section: Structural Ambivalence Virtuous Indecisiveness and The Parad...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we are inspired by Lambek's (2015, 45) emphasis on ethics as a quality of action and action's spirit and by Lambek's (2015, 8) and Arthur Kleinman's (2007) insights on virtue as an important entry point to understanding what matters to people. Our analysis is further informed by notions of bioethics as a symptom of social transitions (Rosenberg 1999) and a product of ambivalence toward progress (Lock 1998; Stevens 2003) and, more specifically, by ethnographic explorations of the emergence of affect in institutional ethics (e.g., Addison 2022). We explore what happens when ethical labor is enacted within a local moral assemblage informed by, among others, institutional respect for ethical ambivalence and a recent history of eugenic state policies.…”
Section: Reproductive Technological Challenges To Social Ordermentioning
Anthropological engagement with moralities and ethics assumes that people evaluate themselves and others according to their notions of good and bad; yet little is known about how people evaluate the quality of their deliberations. Such evaluations of the seriousness of ethical deliberations prevail in Japan’s genetic counseling for pregnant couples considering NIPT, a maternal blood test early in pregnancy that does not endanger the pregnancy but might lead to termination dilemmas. These deliberations are based on the idea that the ambivalence over whether to provide or undergo a potentially selective test is virtuous. This article examines how Japanese policymakers, medical professionals, genetic counselors, and pregnant couples make decisions within social settings that valorize indecisiveness. Ambivalence emerges as the cognitive skill of seeing complexity clearly. How people and their ethnographers evaluate the quality of ethical deliberations is essential to contemplate if we are to understand how people seek to lead a moral life.
摘要
道徳と倫理への人類学的な関与は、人々が善悪の概念に従って自分自身や他人を評価することを前提としている。 しかし、人々がその討議の良し悪しをどのように評価しているかについてはほとんど知られていない。このような倫理討議の深刻な評価は、妊娠を危険にさらすことはないが中絶のジレンマにつながる可能性のある妊娠初期の母体血液検査である NIPT を検討している妊娠中のカップルに対する日本の遺伝カウンセリングでは一般的である。これらの討議と躊躇いは、潜在的に選択的なテストを提供したり受けたりすることが道徳にかなっているのかどうかという両価性の考えに基づいている。 この論文では、日本の政策立案者、医療専門家、遺伝カウンセラー、および妊娠中のカップルが、決断をためらうことに評価する社会環境の中でどのように決定を下すのかを調べる。両価性は、複雑さを明確に見る認知スキルとして現れる。 人々とその民族誌学者が倫理的審理の質をどのように評価するのかは、人々がどのように道徳的な生活を送ろうとしているのかを理解し熟考することが不可欠だ。
“…This did not, however, prevent her from breaking down in the aftermath. Rather than recovering the comfortable moral world, the negative result evoked a moral and emotional breakdown (compare Addison 2022) and a spell of further ethical labor, riddling the taken‐for‐granted moral assumptions about what constitutes appropriate parental demeanor in the face of tentative disability with tension 16…”
Section: Nipt As An “Ethical Turn”: Post‐diagnostic Evaluations and M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, fetal death is acknowledged with a death certificate from as early as twelve weeks of gestation. In the hospital where Ivry conducted field work, the death of a fetus was recognized and commemorated with a structured ritual that Courtney Addison (2022, 268) might identify as an “enchanting turn.” The mid‐wives dress the dead baby in a tiny cotton kimono and arrange it in a special box surrounded with origami flowers. The parents, accompanied by the medical staff, carry the box down a side corridor to a quiet circular room with no religious symbols where they light incense and pray silently.…”
Section: Nipt As An “Ethical Turn”: Post‐diagnostic Evaluations and M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the auspices of structural ambivalence, genetic counseling becomes dedicated to creating space for prospective parents’ ethical deliberations no less than providing them with accessible scientific knowledge (compare Addison 2022). Patients must make up their own minds, but counselors are committed to support their pre‐diagnostic deliberations in preparation for possible future strife.…”
Section: Structural Ambivalence Virtuous Indecisiveness and The Parad...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we are inspired by Lambek's (2015, 45) emphasis on ethics as a quality of action and action's spirit and by Lambek's (2015, 8) and Arthur Kleinman's (2007) insights on virtue as an important entry point to understanding what matters to people. Our analysis is further informed by notions of bioethics as a symptom of social transitions (Rosenberg 1999) and a product of ambivalence toward progress (Lock 1998; Stevens 2003) and, more specifically, by ethnographic explorations of the emergence of affect in institutional ethics (e.g., Addison 2022). We explore what happens when ethical labor is enacted within a local moral assemblage informed by, among others, institutional respect for ethical ambivalence and a recent history of eugenic state policies.…”
Section: Reproductive Technological Challenges To Social Ordermentioning
Anthropological engagement with moralities and ethics assumes that people evaluate themselves and others according to their notions of good and bad; yet little is known about how people evaluate the quality of their deliberations. Such evaluations of the seriousness of ethical deliberations prevail in Japan’s genetic counseling for pregnant couples considering NIPT, a maternal blood test early in pregnancy that does not endanger the pregnancy but might lead to termination dilemmas. These deliberations are based on the idea that the ambivalence over whether to provide or undergo a potentially selective test is virtuous. This article examines how Japanese policymakers, medical professionals, genetic counselors, and pregnant couples make decisions within social settings that valorize indecisiveness. Ambivalence emerges as the cognitive skill of seeing complexity clearly. How people and their ethnographers evaluate the quality of ethical deliberations is essential to contemplate if we are to understand how people seek to lead a moral life.
摘要
道徳と倫理への人類学的な関与は、人々が善悪の概念に従って自分自身や他人を評価することを前提としている。 しかし、人々がその討議の良し悪しをどのように評価しているかについてはほとんど知られていない。このような倫理討議の深刻な評価は、妊娠を危険にさらすことはないが中絶のジレンマにつながる可能性のある妊娠初期の母体血液検査である NIPT を検討している妊娠中のカップルに対する日本の遺伝カウンセリングでは一般的である。これらの討議と躊躇いは、潜在的に選択的なテストを提供したり受けたりすることが道徳にかなっているのかどうかという両価性の考えに基づいている。 この論文では、日本の政策立案者、医療専門家、遺伝カウンセラー、および妊娠中のカップルが、決断をためらうことに評価する社会環境の中でどのように決定を下すのかを調べる。両価性は、複雑さを明確に見る認知スキルとして現れる。 人々とその民族誌学者が倫理的審理の質をどのように評価するのかは、人々がどのように道徳的な生活を送ろうとしているのかを理解し熟考することが不可欠だ。
“…Lastly, several articles engaged with the complex and much-debated question of how to establish ethical relationships with interlocutors or 'research subjects' -in anthropology, but also in other fi elds (e.g. on dis/enchantments produced through the research ethics systems that govern experimental paediatric medicine, see Addison 2022). Most of the articles focused on challenges of ethnography, such as (im)possibilities of translation (Lebner 2022;Taylor 2022), doubts, uncertainties and moral obligations connected to the fi eldworker positionality (Kaell 2022;Pina-Cabral 2022b;Wintrup 2022), or how to deal with and write about ambivalent attitudes towards interlocutors (Rakopoulos 2022b;Wintrup 2022).…”
Section: Research Ethics: Relationships Between Researchers and 'Subj...mentioning
This article provides an overview of the articles published in the main English-speaking European Anthropology journals in 2022. One of the key themes running through these publications is ethics and people's desires and struggles to ‘do good’ – despite, or perhaps because of, the protracted crises the world is currently facing. Attempting to move beyond simple critique, many of the authors empathetically engage with their interlocutors’ ‘ethical endeavours’, which seem to revolve around three main objectives: people want to build better futures, create moral economies and establish ethical relationships. The article summarises a plethora of contributions to these three themes, thereby revealing the many paradoxes, complexities and unexpected outcomes of doing good, and the seemingly inevitable dynamics between people's moral ambitions and their derailments.
Résumé
Cet article repose sur une revue des articles publiés dans les principales revues européennes d'anthropologie en langue anglaise durant l'année 2022. L’éthique est certainement l'un des thèmes saillants parcourant ces publications et avec elle le désir et les luttes des gens pour « bien faire » - en dépit, ou peut-être à cause, des crises sans fin auxquelles le monde fait actuellement face. Dans une tentative pour aller au-delà de la simple critique, de nombreux auteurs s'engagent avec empathie dans les « efforts éthiques » de leurs interlocuteurs, efforts qui tournent autour de trois objectifs principaux : les gens veulent construire un futur meilleur, créer des économies morales et établir des relations éthiques. Cet article résume une pléthore de contributions autour de ces trois thèmes, en révélant les nombreux paradoxes, complexités et conséquences inattendues de la volonté de bien faire, ainsi que les inévitables dynamiques entre les ambitions morales des gens et leurs déraillements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.