Abstract:Nowadays many debates are going on that relate to the agricultural and food sector. It looks as if present technological and organizational developments within the agricultural and food sector are badly geared to societal needs and expectations. In this article we briefly present a toolkit for moral communication within the food chain. This toolkit is developed as part of a European research project. Next, we discuss what such a toolkit can bring about, given the characteristics of the present day agricultural… Show more
“…Previous studies have indicated that there is limited understanding of the potential ecological effects of the application of ethical considerations (Deblonde et al, 2007;Dowd & Burke, 2013). Ecological problems have been connected to negative societal responses, even though attitudes toward the benefits of genetically modified (GM) foods may offset attitudes about its environmental risks (Dowd & Burke, 2013).…”
The commercial use of genetic modification (GM) technology in the food industry has been a common issue in the public. Decision-makers and scholars have indicated the benefits of the application of GM technology to the agriculture and food industries, such as lower production costs and product development with regard to sensory-related factors, health, and convenience that increase farming productivity, food supplies, and efficiency and reduce prices. However, previous studies have indicated that there is limited understanding of the potential ecological effects of the application of GM technology and/or of ethical considerations. Thus, the purpose of this study is to identify the structural relationships among ecological concerns and the Theory of Planned Behavior's (TPB) constructs (attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention) in the genetically modified (GM) food context. The main survey was fielded in a metropolitan area in South Korea from October 11-27, 2013, and a survey of 387 qualified respondents was used using a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. All measures were assessed for unidimensionality, reliability, and construct validity, and then two models (TPB and TPB+EC) were independently tested and compared using SEM. The TPB with ecological concerns included, adopted as the predictive model to measure intention to purchase GM foods, is compared with the explanatory power of both models (the TPB vs. the TPB+EC). The implications of this study are discussed for future research.
“…Previous studies have indicated that there is limited understanding of the potential ecological effects of the application of ethical considerations (Deblonde et al, 2007;Dowd & Burke, 2013). Ecological problems have been connected to negative societal responses, even though attitudes toward the benefits of genetically modified (GM) foods may offset attitudes about its environmental risks (Dowd & Burke, 2013).…”
The commercial use of genetic modification (GM) technology in the food industry has been a common issue in the public. Decision-makers and scholars have indicated the benefits of the application of GM technology to the agriculture and food industries, such as lower production costs and product development with regard to sensory-related factors, health, and convenience that increase farming productivity, food supplies, and efficiency and reduce prices. However, previous studies have indicated that there is limited understanding of the potential ecological effects of the application of GM technology and/or of ethical considerations. Thus, the purpose of this study is to identify the structural relationships among ecological concerns and the Theory of Planned Behavior's (TPB) constructs (attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention) in the genetically modified (GM) food context. The main survey was fielded in a metropolitan area in South Korea from October 11-27, 2013, and a survey of 387 qualified respondents was used using a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. All measures were assessed for unidimensionality, reliability, and construct validity, and then two models (TPB and TPB+EC) were independently tested and compared using SEM. The TPB with ecological concerns included, adopted as the predictive model to measure intention to purchase GM foods, is compared with the explanatory power of both models (the TPB vs. the TPB+EC). The implications of this study are discussed for future research.
“…In the last decade there have been many public and private initiatives to improve standards and introduce food quality schemes in Europe (Deblonde, De Graaff, & Brom, 2007;Trienekens & Zuurbier, 2008). Business-to-consumer quality labels often communicate information on the country of origin, good manufacturing practices or production methods.…”
“…Today's consumers are more and more uncertain about how food companies really behave and how much are they socially responsible (Deblonde et al, 2007); the progressive globalisation of the food supply chain has generated uncertainty on safety and security practices; the consumption of mass food has addressed concerns about pandemic diseases (e.g. mad cow disease, foot and mouth disease, bird flu); the increasing awareness about the risks related to obesity has generated criticism of marketing and distribution practices; the use of genetically modified ingredients has raised the debate about how trustworthy is product labelling (MacDonald and Whellams, 2007) etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fair trade products, eco-compatibility). In this view, Business Ethics and CSR practices become a mean of competitive advantage for food companies (Deblonde et al, 2007).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.