2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00390.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Estimator of Number of Species from Quadrat Sampling

Abstract: Summary We consider the problem of estimating the number of distinct species S in a study area from the recorded presence or absence of species in each of a sample of quadrats. A generalized jackknife estimator of S is derived, along with an estimate of its variance. It is compared with the jackknife estimator for S proposed by Heltshe and Forrester (1983, Biometrics39, 1–12) and the empirical Bayes estimator of Mingoti and Meeden (1992, Biometrics48, 863–875). We show that the empirical Bayes estimator has th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(33 reference statements)
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whenâ goes to zero, the estimator is still well-defined and given bŷ Haas et al (2006) proposed a series of nonparametric estimators based on the generalized jackknife procedure. Whenâ goes to zero, the estimator is still well-defined and given bŷ Haas et al (2006) proposed a series of nonparametric estimators based on the generalized jackknife procedure.…”
Section: Cðt þBþmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenâ goes to zero, the estimator is still well-defined and given bŷ Haas et al (2006) proposed a series of nonparametric estimators based on the generalized jackknife procedure. Whenâ goes to zero, the estimator is still well-defined and given bŷ Haas et al (2006) proposed a series of nonparametric estimators based on the generalized jackknife procedure.…”
Section: Cðt þBþmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For inclusion in this study, it was computational consideration that decided in favour of the latter. The cluster-sampling Downloaded by [UQ Library] at 11:34 19 November 2014 estimator by Haas et al [24] was tested, but unrealistic assumptions about species sizes and associations of occurrence make it unsuitable for small-sample applications. For forest tree species richness estimation from sample data obtained under cluster sampling, the finite mixture modelling approach by Norris and Pollock [47] and Mao and Colwell [39] has disappointed [37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there is no single uniformly superior estimator of richness [7,37,66]. Rather, the performance of an estimator may be excellent in one Downloaded by [UQ Library] at 11: 34 19 November 2014 population and less so in another for reasons that are difficult to anticipate and discern from the sample data [24]. For the purpose of demonstration, we have chosen SO and five estimators of S in our study (c.f.…”
Section: Estimation Objectives and Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Good (1953) first addressed the issue of estimating E (C r ) and proposed an empirical Bayesian approach. Examples of bias due to failing to account for sampling without replacement in species richness estimation can be found in , Haas et al (2006), and Chao and Lin (2012). The Good-Turing method has been applied successfully in several disciplines, such as information retrieval (Song and Croft, 1999), computational linguistics (Church and Hanks, 1990), speech recognition (Jelinek, 1998;Chen and Goodman, 1999), species richness estimation (Esty, 1985;, population size estimation , Shannon entropy estimation , and missile coverage estimation (Lo, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%