1996
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj1965.74.6_763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Estimation of the Radiative Effect in the Stratosphere due to the Pinatubo Aerosol

Abstract: The global distribution of the Pinatubo aerosol in the stratosphere is constructed for optical thickness at 1µm by combining satellite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During southern colder winters, in the southern polar region, there also appears, though very weak, a warming area, which is in sharp contrast to a cooling area during northern winters in the northern polar region. Similar distinct contrast between the two winter hemispheres can be seen in the evaluation of the radiative effect of volcanic sulfate aerosol (Shibata et al, 1996).…”
Section: Radiative Heatingsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During southern colder winters, in the southern polar region, there also appears, though very weak, a warming area, which is in sharp contrast to a cooling area during northern winters in the northern polar region. Similar distinct contrast between the two winter hemispheres can be seen in the evaluation of the radiative effect of volcanic sulfate aerosol (Shibata et al, 1996).…”
Section: Radiative Heatingsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Consider an equilibrated stratosphere (control stratosphere) in which the vertical profile of background sulfate aerosol is fixed and temporal variation is due to cyclic seasonal march alone. Then, the above equation is written as atQ-Q For another equilibrium stratosphere(perturbed stratosphere) of increased background aerosol, the equation becomes aTpQ DQ +R (3) tpp Here the framework of FDH is used to investigate only the radiative effect (Ramanathan and Dickinson, 1979;Fels et al, 1980;Ramanathan et al, 1983;Pawson and Shine, 1991;Shine, 1993;Ramaswamy and Bowen, 1994;Shibata et al, 1996). That is, Q=QD.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%