2004
DOI: 10.1029/2004gl021051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An estimate of the global distribution of radon emissions from the ocean

Abstract: [1] There is a need for improved estimates of the radon ( 222 Rn) flux density from the ocean for use in the modeling and interpretation of atmospheric radon in global climate and air pollution studies. We use a modification of a frequently used model of gas transfer to generate global predictions of ocean radon flux density for each month of the year (climate averaged) on a 192 by 94 global grid. Compared with the often-used approximation of a constant radon flux from the ocean, the model's predictions indica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
63
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on ocean areas reduces uncertainties in the model results: The diurnal temperature cycle is weaker over the oceans than over land (Seidel et al, 2005), hence using daily long term mean temperatures yields a smaller error over oceans compared with land. Oceans are also only weak sources of radon (Schery and Huang, 2004) and of ammonia (Dentener and Crutzen, 1994) compared with land masses, and hence neglecting their effect on ion production and nucleation is more appropriate over the oceans than over continents. Nonetheless, ammonia and radon are transported from land over the oceans where they can aid nucleation, which we do not account for.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on ocean areas reduces uncertainties in the model results: The diurnal temperature cycle is weaker over the oceans than over land (Seidel et al, 2005), hence using daily long term mean temperatures yields a smaller error over oceans compared with land. Oceans are also only weak sources of radon (Schery and Huang, 2004) and of ammonia (Dentener and Crutzen, 1994) compared with land masses, and hence neglecting their effect on ion production and nucleation is more appropriate over the oceans than over continents. Nonetheless, ammonia and radon are transported from land over the oceans where they can aid nucleation, which we do not account for.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radon is an unreactive, poorly soluble, radioactive gas (t 0.5 = 3.82d) that is emitted naturally from ice-free, unsaturated terrestrial surfaces at a rate that varies slowly both geographically and temporally (0.72-1.2 atoms cm −2 s −1 ; Turekian et al, 1977;Lambert et al, 1982;Jacob et al, 1997) and is two orders of magnitude greater than from open bodies of water (Wilkening and Clements, 1975;Schery and Huang, 2004). The half-life of radon is sufficiently long that it can be assumed to be an approximately conservative tracer over the course of a single night, while being short enough that it does not accumulate in the atmosphere and typically exhibiting an order of magnitude gradient between the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) and the lower troposphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from local mineralogy and element composition of the soil, continental emission rates depend on soil texture and soil humidity and typically range between 0.005 and 0.050 Bq m −2 s −1 (Nazaroff, 1992;Karstens et al, 2013), about two orders of magnitude higher than oceanic emissions (e.g. Schery and Huang, 2004). For the latter a recent study derived from long-term 222 Rn observation at Cape Grim (Tasmania) an oceanic 222 Rn emission rate of around 2.7 × 10 −4 Bq m −2 s −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%