1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00268784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An estimate of the frequency of in vivo transcriptional errors at a nonsense codon in Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S4) in B. subtilis with those obtained using an ocher nonsense codon in E. coli (15,17) revealed that our measurements are at least 10-fold higher than previous estimates, raising the possibility that an error occurs approximately once every 200 codons. Errors exceeding 0.1% have been previously reported for specific missense mutations and are generally considered exceptional (e.g.…”
Section: Si Materials and Methods)contrasting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…S4) in B. subtilis with those obtained using an ocher nonsense codon in E. coli (15,17) revealed that our measurements are at least 10-fold higher than previous estimates, raising the possibility that an error occurs approximately once every 200 codons. Errors exceeding 0.1% have been previously reported for specific missense mutations and are generally considered exceptional (e.g.…”
Section: Si Materials and Methods)contrasting
confidence: 67%
“…In vivo measurements of errors in gene expression in bacteria have been estimated to occur at a rate of 10 −4 to 10 −5 per nucleotide during transcription and ≈10 −3 to 10 −4 per codon during translation. These error rates are significantly higher than that attributed to the highfidelity replication process, where the frequency of errors is as low as 10 −8 to 10 −9 per nucleotide (8,9,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…30 Such insertion causes a -1 frameshift, which would abolish expression of the full-length TK required to phosphorylate the ACV in order to activate its anti-viral activity. 31 On the RNA level, although the transcription error rate is considered much lower than those during DNA replication, 32 insertion or deletion of a nucleotide can also occur during transcription leading to a frameshift. 33,34,35 The insertion/deletion is believed to involve a slippage between the DNA and RNA strands similar to the Streisinger DNA slippage model, and also tends to occur more frequently on mononucleotide repeats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%