2001
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-01-02938-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An estimate for weighted Hilbert transform via square functions

Abstract: Abstract. We show that the norm of the Hilbert transform as an operator on the weighted space L 2 (w) is bounded by a constant multiple of the 3/2 power of the A 2 constant of w, in other words by c sup I ( ω I ω −1 I ) 3/2 . We also give a short proof for sharp upper and lower bounds for the dyadic square function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem remained open for a few years and was finally answered by Hukovič, Treil, and Volberg [10]: the exponent 1 is the best. See also the paper [20] by Petermichl and Pott, and [26] by Wittwer. This result was significantly extended by Cruz-Uribe, Martell, and Pérez [5] to the case of general A p weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem remained open for a few years and was finally answered by Hukovič, Treil, and Volberg [10]: the exponent 1 is the best. See also the paper [20] by Petermichl and Pott, and [26] by Wittwer. This result was significantly extended by Cruz-Uribe, Martell, and Pérez [5] to the case of general A p weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that the sharp dependence is linear, i.e., the best exponent is 1. This result was later reproved by Wittwer [49] and Petermichl and Pott in [37] using a different approach. Actually, the latter paper contains also the proof of the reverse inequality…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…and the best power of [w] A p is at least max 1, 1 p−1 . In the case p = 2 and T = H is the Hilbert transform, Petermichl and Pott improved it to the power 3 2 (see [28]) and, later on, Petermichl in [25] obtained the best possible linear dependence for p ≥ 2. For the case 1 < p < 2, that dependence of the [w] A p constant is a consequence of the sharp extrapolation proved in [5].…”
Section: And We Define [W]mentioning
confidence: 99%