Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory
DOI: 10.1109/isit.1995.535778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An error exponent for lossy source coding with side information at the decoder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foremost, in Theorem 2 the innermost optimization is over Q X|Y , so that X, Y, S adhere to the Markov structure, yet in the achievable exponent this Markov constraint is not present. This differing Markov structure is also present in the partial Wyner-Ziv exponent results of Jayaraman and Berger [18], [32] who attribute the gap between the sphere packing and random exponents (present even at low rates) in the binning exponent problem they studied to this type of difference in the Markov structure. The other differences between η L and η U are the range of the inner most optimization, the presence of the binning term in the achievable exponent and the fact that the choice of test channel is restricted in the upper bound.…”
Section: Sccsi Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Foremost, in Theorem 2 the innermost optimization is over Q X|Y , so that X, Y, S adhere to the Markov structure, yet in the achievable exponent this Markov constraint is not present. This differing Markov structure is also present in the partial Wyner-Ziv exponent results of Jayaraman and Berger [18], [32] who attribute the gap between the sphere packing and random exponents (present even at low rates) in the binning exponent problem they studied to this type of difference in the Markov structure. The other differences between η L and η U are the range of the inner most optimization, the presence of the binning term in the achievable exponent and the fact that the choice of test channel is restricted in the upper bound.…”
Section: Sccsi Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Let F n be as defined in (32). We may move the optimizations appearing in (41) into the exponent and this yields P e · ≤ exp(−n(F n (P XY , R 1 , R 2 ))).…”
Section: We Now Show Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jayaraman and Berger [10] studied error exponents for the Wyner-Ziv problem, although they restricted their attention to the probability that a binning error occurs. As mentioned earlier, we derived an achievable exponent for the discrete memoryless case and showed that a binning error is only one of two competing error events [4].…”
Section: Other Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%