2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59126-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Error Analysis of Structured Light Scanning of Biological Tissue

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents an error analysis and correction model for four structured light methods applied to three common types of biological tissue; skin, fat and muscle. Despite its many advantages, structured light is based on the assumption of direct reflection at the object surface only. This assumption is violated by most biological material e.g. human skin, which exhibits subsurface light reflection. In this study, we find that in general, structured light scans of biological tissue deviate signifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally speaking, only the pure direct reflection can be used for determining the 3D shape of human face. However, the direct reflection is usually quite weak, i.e., only few percent of the incident signal for the measurement of human face, while most of the projected light and background illumination will go through the interface and undergo the multiple scattering process [ 26 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, only the pure direct reflection can be used for determining the 3D shape of human face. However, the direct reflection is usually quite weak, i.e., only few percent of the incident signal for the measurement of human face, while most of the projected light and background illumination will go through the interface and undergo the multiple scattering process [ 26 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once depth has been captured, the pattern projection images are discarded afterwards. However, error will occur in the conversion process due to difficulties relating to the environment, surface properties and the hardware (Rachakonda et al 2019;Jensen et al 2017;Gupta et al 2011;Scharstein and Szeliski 2003b). Primarily, errors will occur at the pixel classification stage which for example can be caused by reflections or hardware malfunction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piedra-Cascón et al 14 utilized an infrared sensing face scanner to recover 3D face shape, which performs significantly better than the manual measurement in terms of accuracy and speed. However, the captured face image is usually poor owing to the imaging quality of the infrared camera, 15,16 subsurface scattering, 17,18 and so on, making it difficult work to measure the face 3D geometry accurately. 19,20 That the imaging quality of the infrared camera is worse than that of the visible camera makes the fringes captured through the infrared camera have properties of low contrast and poor sinusoidal feature extensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…utilized an infrared sensing face scanner to recover 3D face shape, which performs significantly better than the manual measurement in terms of accuracy and speed. However, the captured face image is usually poor owing to the imaging quality of the infrared camera, 15 , 16 subsurface scattering, 17 , 18 and so on, making it difficult work to measure the face 3D geometry accurately 19 , 20 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%