1973
DOI: 10.1093/imamat/11.1.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Error Analysis for Numerical Differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…75-81] and Rutishauser [13]. Here a sequence of second-order central difference approximations, Johnson and Riess [7] proved that the final result T Although thus mathematically equivalent to the algorithm described earlier, this extrapolation (7b) of the symmetric second-order approximations (7a) clearly involves fewer arithmetic operations and would seem to be preferable from this standpoint. If f(x) can be evaluated only on one side of x 0, however, then we must revert to extrapolating the one-sided approximations (3a), as Fflippi and Engels [5] pointed out.…”
Section: Relationships Between Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…75-81] and Rutishauser [13]. Here a sequence of second-order central difference approximations, Johnson and Riess [7] proved that the final result T Although thus mathematically equivalent to the algorithm described earlier, this extrapolation (7b) of the symmetric second-order approximations (7a) clearly involves fewer arithmetic operations and would seem to be preferable from this standpoint. If f(x) can be evaluated only on one side of x 0, however, then we must revert to extrapolating the one-sided approximations (3a), as Fflippi and Engels [5] pointed out.…”
Section: Relationships Between Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[45], [65], [198]- [201], [217]- [220] -and of course mimics several of its ascendants -see e.g. [2], [3], [7]- [8], [9], [13], [19], [38], [44], [47], [48], [51], [52], [59], [73], [79], [97], [103], [110], [111], [133], [134], [146], [155]- [156], [157], [158], [162], [180]- [181], [182], [188], [193], [203], [204], [216], [225].…”
Section: Behavior Near the Causticmentioning
confidence: 99%