2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ERP study of visual change detection: Effects of magnitude of spatial frequency changes on the change-related posterior positivity

Abstract: In event-related brain potential (ERP) studies using a visual S1-S2 matching task, change stimuli elicit a posterior positivity at around 100-200 ms. In the present study, we investigated the effects of magnitude of spatial frequency changes on change-related positivity. Each trial consisted of two sequentially presented stimuli (S1-S2), where S2 was either (1) the same as S1 (i.e., NO-change, p = .40), (2) different from S1 in spatial frequency only (SF-change, .40), (3) different in orientation only (OR-chan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak latency and scalp-distribution of the positivity are consistent with change-related positivity observed in previous studies (e.g., Fonteneau and Davidoff, 2007;Fu et al, 2003;Kimura et al, 2005aKimura et al, , 2005bKimura et al, , 2006aKimura et al, , 2006bKimura et al, , 2006cWang et al, 2003). The present finding that change-related positivity was elicited by size decrements suggests that such change-related positivity could be elicited when stimulus changes engage memory-comparison-based change detection but do not strongly engage refractoriness-based rareness detection.…”
Section: An Erp Correlate Of Memory-comparison-based Change Detectionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The peak latency and scalp-distribution of the positivity are consistent with change-related positivity observed in previous studies (e.g., Fonteneau and Davidoff, 2007;Fu et al, 2003;Kimura et al, 2005aKimura et al, , 2005bKimura et al, , 2006aKimura et al, , 2006bKimura et al, , 2006cWang et al, 2003). The present finding that change-related positivity was elicited by size decrements suggests that such change-related positivity could be elicited when stimulus changes engage memory-comparison-based change detection but do not strongly engage refractoriness-based rareness detection.…”
Section: An Erp Correlate Of Memory-comparison-based Change Detectionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Second, although the present results support the notion that change-related positivity reflects memory-comparison-based change detection (e.g., Fonteneau and Davidoff, 2007;Kimura et al, 2005aKimura et al, , 2005bKimura et al, , 2006aKimura et al, , 2006bKimura et al, , 2006c, except for S1-S2 matching studies (Fu et al, 2003;Kimura et al, 2005aKimura et al, , 2005bKimura et al, , 2006aKimura et al, , 2006bKimura et al, , 2006cWang et al, 2003) and some oddball studies (Fonteneau and Davidoff, 2007;Kimura et al, 2006c) Finally, the present study found three early change-related effects (change-related negativity, change-related positivity, and frontal positivity). At present, the precise relationship between attentional capture and these early change-related effects is still unclear.…”
Section: Future Researchsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations